Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission

Survey & Research Reports

Nebel Knitting Mill Annex

 

Name and location of the property: The property formerly known as the Nebel Knitting Mill Annex is located at 127 West Worthington Avenue at Camden Road in Charlotte, NC.

Name, address, and telephone number of the present owner of the property: The owner of the property is:

 

Camden Square Associates LLC

c/o MECA Properties

908 S. Tryon St.

Charlotte, NC 28202

Telephone: (704) 372-9461

 

Representative photographs of the property: This report contains representative photographs of the property.

A map depicting the location of the property: This report contains a map that depicts the location of the property.

 

Current Deed Book Reference to the property: The most recent deed to this property is listed in Mecklenburg County Deed Book 8984 on page 972. The Tax Parcel Number of the property is 121-022-03.

A brief historical sketch of the property: This report contains a brief historical sketch of the property prepared by Emily D. Ramsey.

A brief architectural description of the property: This report contains a brief architectural description of the property prepared by Emily D. Ramsey.

Documentation of why and in what ways the property meets the criteria for designation set forth in NCGS 160A-400.5:

  1. Special significance in terms of its history, architecture and/or cultural importance:

The Historic Landmarks Commission judges that the property known as the Nebel Knitting Mill Annex does possess special significance in terms of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County, based on the following considerations:

The Nebel Knitting Mill Annex is a tangible reflection of the tremendous growth that the hosiery industry in particular experienced during the post-war period in Charlotte-Mecklenburg.

The Nebel Knitting Mill Annex is important for its association with William Nebel, the founder of the Nebel Knitting Company, a pioneer in the southern hosiery business and the man responsible for bringing the hosiery industry to Charlotte.

The Nebel Knitting Mill Annex is architecturally significant as one of the few examples of the Art Moderne building style in the Charlotte area, and represents the aggressive efforts towards modernization within the Charlotte-Mecklenburg hosiery industry after World-War II.

The building was designed by Herman V. Biberstein, noted Charlotte engineer and architect and son of Richard C. Biberstein, who designed the Nebel Knitting Mill at 101 West Worthington in the 1920s.

  1. Integrity of design, setting, workmanship, materials, feeling and/or association:

The Historic Landmarks Commission contends that the architectural description included in this report demonstrates that the Nebel Knitting Mill Annex meets this criterion.

Ad Valorem Tax Appraisal: The Historic Landmarks Commission is aware that designation would allow the owner to apply for an automatic deferral of 50% of the Ad Valorem taxes on all or any portion of the property which becomes a designated “historic landmark”. The current appraised value of the improvements is $469,360. The current appraised value of the .719 acres is $112,750. The property is zoned UMUD.

Date of Preparation of this Report: 14 August 1999

Prepared by: Emily D. Ramsey

745 Georgia Trail

Lincolnton, NC 28092

Telephone: (704) 922-5198

 

Statement of Significance

The Nebel Knitting Mill Annex

127 West Worthington Avenue

Charlotte, NC

 

 

 

Summary Paragraph

The Nebel Knitting Mill Annex, erected in 1946, is a structure that possesses local historic significance as a building that reflects, both in its style and its function, the push towards modernization and the tremendous growth that occurred in the Charlotte hosiery industry after World War II. William Nebel, a third-generation German knitter who brought the hosiery industry to Charlotte when he established the Nebel Knitting Company in 1923, was a pioneer in the hosiery industry. His company produced innovative styles for full-fashioned lady’s hosiery until the late 1960s, and Nebel himself held over a dozen patents for his original designs. The Nebel Knitting Company initiated a period of rapid growth in the fledgling Charlotte hosiery industry throughout the 1920s and 1930s and created much needed diversity within the city’s textile industry, which was dominated by cotton textile manufacturers. The Nebel Knitting Company continued to flourish through the Great Depression, with a newly expanded building located at 101 West Worthington Avenue. William Nebel and his company were in a prime position at the end of World War II to meet the tremendous demand for women’s full-fashioned nylon hosiery, and in the post-war period the Nebel Knitting Company became the largest and most productive hosiery concern in Mecklenburg County, and an internationally known name in hosiery. As the center of a large expansion program designed to modernize the Nebel Knitting Company completely, the 1946 annex to the Nebel Knitting Mill is a tangible reminder of this boom time in Charlotte industry, and represents the importance of modernization within the textile industry during the post-war period.

Architecturally, the Nebel Knitting Mill Annex is significant as one of the few buildings within the Charlotte-Mecklenburg area designed in the Art Moderne style. Most textile mills in the area, including the adjacent Nebel Knitting Mill at 101 West Worthington Ave, were “revivalistic structures” which reflected the “conservative philosophy that characterized the political, social and economic thinking of Charlotte’s business elite”. Herman V. Biberstein’s innovative design for the Nebel Knitting Mill Annex broke with this conservative trend. The strong horizontal lines of the facade, emphasized by closely spaced concrete stringcourses and subtly balanced with simple pilasters are elements which characterized the revolutionary art and architecture movements of the early twentieth century. The building was decorated only with its clean lines, understated details and symmetry – elements that were indicative of the Art Moderne style. Such a structure not only broke with the architectural tradition of the Charlotte’s textile community, it also reflected the move towards a more modern industry. The Nebel Knitting Mill Annex housed the most up-to-date knitting machinery available after the war, and the modern elements of the structure reflected the changes taking place within the industry, giving the Nebel Knitting Company a modern image to go along with its revolutionary knitting techniques.

 

Commerce and Industry Context and Historical Background Statement

The Nebel Knitting Mill Annex, erected in 1946, housed operations that contributed significantly to the revolutionary growth of the Southern hosiery industry within the Charlotte area during the boom period following World War II. When William Nebel, a German immigrant and third-generation knitter, came to Charlotte and established the Nebel Knitting Company in 1923, the city was “on the crest of the wave” in terms of its textile production and prosperity. Charlotte was, at that time, “the largest center in the South for textile mill machinery and equipment,” and the city served as the heart of a large and profitable textile region that covered North and South Carolina as well as large parts of Tennessee and Georgia. Charlotte’s reputation within the textile community made it an attractive site for a diverse array of new businesses and manufacturers, including William Nebel. When the Nebel Knitting Company began its small operation on the second floor of a building on East Kingston Avenue, it was the first knitting manufacturer in the Charlotte area. Although other knitting manufacturers soon followed (there were five hosiery mills in Charlotte by the 1930s), the Nebel Knitting Company continued to prosper. The company quickly outgrew its East Kingston Avenue location, and in 1925 Nebel moved his operations into a much larger building at 1822-1824 South Boulevard. By the end of the 1920s, the company had again expanded its production to meet the skyrocketing demand for women’s full-fashioned hosiery. The construction of a new building, situated beside the Southern Railroad line at 101 West Worthington Avenue in the heart of the prestigious Dilworth industrial sector, reflected Nebel’s tremendous success in Charlotte. The new mill was completed in 1927 and expanded in 1929 to more than double its original size, making it the largest hosiery mill in the city.

The economic devastation of the Great Depression, which destroyed many Charlotte textile manufacturers during the 1930s, did not stop production in the area’s relatively new hosiery industry. The Nebel Knitting Company continued to produce nylon hosiery throughout the Depression, and William Nebel would later claim that his company, even during the most difficult times, had “never had a year when it wasn’t in the black”. The beginning of World War II opened even more opportunities in the hosiery industry. Many manufacturers switched to war-time production of nylon military supplies, which had replaced silk in the manufacturing of tents, ropes, and parachute material.

The post-war period was a tremendously prosperous time for the Nebel Knitting Company and for the industry as a whole. After the war, the Southern hosiery industry was poised to enter its biggest boom period to date. As soon as December of 1945, the Charlotte Observer proclaimed that there would soon be “a great expansion of the South’s knitting industry”, brought about by an unprecedented demand for women’s full-fashioned hosiery; Taylor R. Durham, secretary of the Southern Hosiery Manufacturers Association, revealed in the article that “quite a number of companies [were] planning expansion of their production capacity”. William Nebel, determined to take advantage of the boom in business and the new technologies within the knitting industry, outlined an ambitious plan for the expansion and complete modernization of the Nebel Knitting Mill. The cornerstone of this plan involved the building of a new, modern addition to the existing building at 101 West Worthington, which would give the company a total 125,000 square feet of working space. Nebel commissioned Charlotte architect Herman V. Biberstein, son of Richard C. Biberstein (who had designed the Nebel Knitting Mill) and head of the architectural firm Biberstein & Bowles since his father’s death in 1931, to design the new addition. The resulting structure, the Nebel Knitting Mill Annex, was completed in 1946 and outfitted with the most modern knitting machinery available within the next two years. By 1949, Women’s Daily Wear magazine reported that the Nebel Knitting Company was beginning “production of 60-gauge, 15-denier nylon full-fashioned hosiery” at its newly modernized plant.

To draw attention to the company’s newly outfitted and modernized facilities, and to the innovative styles of women’s hosiery produced in the mill’s modern annex, William Nebel began an extensive and aggressive national advertising campaign in the late 1940s. The new ads, which appeared in prestigious women’s magazines such as Vogue, Charm, Bazaar, Seventeen and Glamour, featured well-known movie star Jane Russell and helped to make Nebel a top name in hosiery not only in the South, but throughout the country. The company’s success and its rising prestige within the industry during and after the 1940s made it not only the “largest and most productive hosiery concern in Mecklenburg County” but also one of the largest in the Southeast. William Nebel followed the lead of other major textile operators in the Carolinas and kept an office on the eighteenth floor of the Empire State Building. “Nebel and nylons”, the Charlotte News declared in 1953, “are two words that are often spoken by the nation’s retail merchants”.

The Nebel Knitting Company led the Charlotte hosiery industry into a new era of modern manufacturing during the boom period following World War II. William Nebel, Charlotte-Mecklenburg’s most successful hosiery manufacturer and a pioneer in the hosiery industry, not only brought the industry to Charlotte, but continued throughout the post-WWII period to push for modernization and innovation within the hosiery industry. The Nebel Knitting Mill continued to produce women’s hosiery and pantyhose until 1968, when the complex (including the original structure and the annex) was sold to Chadbourn, Inc. The Nebel Knitting Mill Annex is currently occupied by Design Center of the Carolinas.

 

Architectural Description and Historical Background Statement

 

The Nebel Knitting Mill Annex, constructed in 1946, stands on the corner of West Worthington Avenue and Hawkins Street at 127 West Worthington Avenue. The structure is one of many buildings that comprise the industrial sector of nearby Dilworth, Charlotte’s first streetcar suburb. The location of the Nebel Knitting Mill Annex and its neighbors is intimately tied to three important events: the laying of the first Charlotte line of the Southern Railroad along South Boulevard in October of 1852; the development of Charlotte’s first cross-town electric streetcar system in 1891; and the subsequent rise of Dilworth, Charlotte’s first streetcar suburb. Edward Dilworth Latta and the Charlotte Consolidated Construction Company developed the Dilworth area during the late nineteenth century and the early twentieth century. The key to Dilworth’s long-term success as a residential community lay in the development of a nearby industrial sector, which brought hundreds of families to the area. Large manufacturing plants like the Atherton Cotton Mill, the Charlotte Trouser Factory, and the Park Manufacturing Company formed the basis of the new industrial district, which the Charlotte Observer dubbed in 1895, “the Manchester of Charlotte”. “Because employees found residences in Dilworth,” historian Dan Morrill explains, “the newly established industries in the suburb enabled the residential scheme of the Charlotte Consolidated Construction Company to survive.” With easy access to both the railroad and a main streetcar line that ran from Dilworth to the intersection of Tryon Street and Trade Street (the heart of downtown Charlotte), it was inevitable that the area between South Boulevard and the railroad line in Dilworth would develop into a major industrial sector.

When William Nebel came to Charlotte in 1923 to set up the Nebel Knitting Company, the Dilworth industrial sector was a thriving area of diverse businesses and manufacturers of trousers, flour, shirts, textile supplies, elevators and heaters were just a few of the products that flowed out of the district. It was an ideal location for the first Charlotte hosiery concern, and Nebel set up his modest operation in the second floor of a building on East Kingston Avenue. As the company prospered and expanded, Nebel kept his company near the Dilworth area, first moving to a larger building at 1822-1824 South Boulevard and finally constructing his own plant on West Worthington Avenue, bordering the railroad tracks.

By the time plans for a modern annex to the Nebel Knitting Mill were drawn up in 1945, the streetcar line was gone, and an ever-expanding network of paved highways that had begun converging in Charlotte during the 1920s made trucks a rival to the railroad as a means of transporting goods. The end of World War II signaled the beginning of a modern era for the hosiery industry, and William Nebel’s ambitious plans for the expansion and modernization of his plant and his products reflected the post-war boom in hosiery. The new, modern annex, which would house $500,000 worth of top-of-the-line knitting equipment that Nebel had ordered, was the center of the expansion plan. The contract was awarded to the Atlanta Building Company in December of 1945, and a building permit was issued on January 29, 1946. Herman V. Biberstein, son of noted Charlotte architect Richard C. Biberstein, was chosen as the architect for the estimated $150,000 project.

Designed in the distinctive 20th century Art Moderne style, which stressed the reflection of a structure’s function through emphasis on the utilization of new technologies, simple massing and very little ornamentation, the building was a fitting symbol for the new direction that the Southern hosiery industry, led by the Nebel Knitting Company, was taking. Not only would the 30,000-square-foot, steel, concrete and brick structure be outfitted with the most modern equipment, it would also feature “the most modern type of air-conditioning and artificial lighting” and a new form of insulation which would be “inside the masonry”. Although Nebel intended the new annex and the existing plant to operate essentially as “one unit,” the Nebel Knitting Mill Annex, with its distinctive and atypical Art Moderne elements, must have seemed an odd contrast to the more conservative style of the Nebel Knitting Company’s main building, a traditional “revivalistic structure” that reflected “the conservative political, social, and economic thinking” of the past decades. H. V. Biberstein’s innovative design for the annex broke with these traditions, creating one of the few Art Moderne structures in the Charlotte area.

The Nebel Knitting Mill Annex consists of a single structure located on a rectangular lot on the corner of West Worthington Avenue and Hawkins Street, to the southeast of the center city area on the west side of South Boulevard and the Southern Railroad line. It borders the sidewalk on both the northeast and northwest sides, and faces West Worthington Avenue. The building is a two-story, square-shaped red brick building in common bond, five bays wide by six bays deep, with a flat roof interrupted by a centrally located arch which indicates the location of an interior atrium.

The facade of the building is done in a deep russet face brick. The strong horizontal lines of the facade are emphasized by closely spaced concrete stringcourses which lead the viewer to the front entrance, a centrally located recessed entryway covered by a curved metal roof which bears the name of the current occupant, the Design Center of the Carolinas. The entrance itself is highlighted with alternating rows of stack-bonded brick and concrete which surround the recess. The strong horizontal emphasis of the first floor of the facade is subtly balanced with simple brick pilasters in stack bond. A plain concrete stringcourse runs along the facade and visually separates the upper and lower floors. The fenestration of the building is regularly punctuated along the facade. Two groupings of three windows flank each side of a large central window that rises to the top of the arched roofline of the atrium. The windows have a rectangular, 5 over 6 configuration with clear glass panes and blue-painted metal muntins. Four grouping of two windows with the same configuration can be seen on the northwest side of the building.

The interior of the Nebel Knitting Mill Annex was remodeled extensively in the mid-1990s. The original layout, two separate stories of uninterrupted space designed to accommodate Nebel’s large knitting machines, has been converted into a series of small business spaces surrounding a central atrium. Much of the second floor was removed to create the atrium; the original wood flooring was used to create the new second floor balconies. A new metal staircase rises to the second floor balconies at the front of the atrium. The fenestration on the facade and the northwest side, as well as clerestory windows above, were added to light the new space.

Although the building was altered during this 1995-96 remodeling, it still retains many of its important exterior features, and no changes have been made to the overall massing of the structure. The building retains its clean lines, understated details and symmetry – elements that were indicative of the Art Moderne style. The Nebel Knitting Mill Annex is a structure that is significant not only because it broke with the architectural tradition of Charlotte’s textile community, but also because it is reflective of the move towards a more modern industry in the post-war years. The Nebel Knitting Mill Annex housed the most up-to-date knitting machinery available after the war, and the modern elements of the actual structure reflected the changes taking place within the industry, giving the Nebel Knitting Company a modern image to go along with its revolutionary knitting techniques.


Nebel Knitting Mill

 

1. Name and location of the property: The property known as the Nebel Knitting Mill (former) is located at 101 West Worthington Avenue at Camden Road in Charlotte, NC.

2. Name, address, and telephone number of the present owner of the property: The owner of the property is:

Old Spaghetti Warehouse, Inc.
6120 Aldwick Drive
Garland, Texas 75045

Telephone: (214) 226-6000

Tax Parcel Number: 121-022-03

3. Representative photographs of the property: This report contains representative photographs of the property.

4. A map depicting the location of the property: This report contains maps which depict the location of the property.

5. Current Deed Book Reference to the property: The most recent deed to this property is listed in Mecklenburg County Deed Book 6321 at page 24. The Tax Parcel Number of the property is 121-022-03.

6. A brief historical sketch of the property: This report contains a brief historical sketch of the property prepared by Suzanne S. Pickens and Richard L. Mattson, Ph.D., Historic Preservation Services.

7. A brief architectural description of the property: This report contains a brief architectural description of the property prepared by Suzanne S. Pickens and Richard L. Mattson, Ph.D., Historic Preservation Services.

8. Documentation of why and in what ways the property meets criteria for designation set forth In NCG.S. 160A-400.5:

 

a. Special significance in terms of its history, architecture, and /or cultural importance: The Commission judges that the property known as the Nebel Knitting Mill (former) does possess special significance in terms of Charlotte-Mecklenburg. The Commission bases its judgment on the following consideration:
1) the Nebel Knitting Mill (former) is the most intact hosiery mill yet identified in Charlotte;
2) the Nebel Knitting Mill (former) is architecturally significant as an intact and finely, yet subtly ornamented example of industrial architecture constructed in the late 1920s;
3) the building was designed by Richard C. Biberstein, noted Charlotte mill engineer and architect;
4) the Nebel Knitting Mill (former) is significant as a tangible reminder of the importance of the full fashioned silk hosiery industry to the diversification and, in some cases, the survival of the textile industry in North Carolina during the post-World War I slump in the industry and the effects of the Great Depression on textile production; and
5) the building is important for its association with the Nebel Knitting Company and its founder, William Nebel, a pioneer in bringing the hosiery industry to the South, to North Carolina, and to Charlotte and Mecklenburg County in particular.

b. Integrity of design, setting, workmanship, materials, feeling, and/or association: The Commission contends that the architectural description by Historic Preservation Services included in this report demonstrates that the Nebel Knitting Mill (former) meets this criterion.

9. Ad Valorem Tax Appraisal: The Commission is aware that designation would allow the owner to apply for an automatic deferral of 50% of the Ad Valorem taxes on all or any portion of the property which becomes a designated “historic landmark.” The current appraised value of the improvements is $902,400. The current appraised value of the 1.769 acres is $96,500. The total appraised value of the property is $998,700. The property is zoned I-2.

Date of Preparation of this Report: 26 November 1990

Prepared by: Dr. Dan L. Morrill in conjunction with Nora M. Black
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission
1225 South Caldwell Street, Box D
Charlotte North Carolina 28203

Telephone: (704) 376-9115

 

 

Architectural Description
 

NOTE: The following architectural and historical reports, combined on the form entitled “National Register of Historic Places Registration Form, ” were prepared by Historic Preservation Services under the auspices of Old Spaghetti Warehouse, Inc. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission is not responsible for errors.

A Physical Description

Constructed in 1927 and expanded in 1929, the (former) Nebel Knitting Mill, manufacturer of ladies fine quality, full-fashioned hosiery until 1968, is the most intact hosiery mill in Charlotte. Vacant since the fall of 1989, the mill complex stands at 101 West Worthington Avenue, on a parcel bounded by West Worthington, Camden Road, Hawkins Street, and a service alley. In addition to the 1927-1929 mill, the complex includes a 1946 expansion–a separate building attached to the 1927 section by a covered truck passageway, now bricked in. This 1946 building, with distinctive Art Moderne elements of style, has been detached from the 1927-1929 mill during the mill’s adaptive rehabilitation, and is not being proposed for nomination to the National Register.

Noted Charlotte textile mill architect and engineer Richard C. Biberstein designed the 1927-1929 Nebel mill. Extant architectural specifications for the 1929 section indicate that Biberstein and William Nebel, founder of the Nebel Knitting Company, intended this section to match the 1927 buildings in materials and detailing (Biberstein Collection). Integrated as one two-story building approximately 204 feet across the facade and 182 feet deep, and sharing similar materials and decorative elements, the 1927-1929 mill includes an open square with an approximately 9,000 square-foot courtyard in the center. Since the knitting of fine, full-fashioned, silk and synthetic hosiery required superior eyesight and good light, it is likely the mill was designed with this configuration to allow for maximum natural light during the day shifts. Notes by the architect indicate that William Nebel specified that the mill should be wide enough for two knitting machines; the layout of the mill, then, gave each knitter a large window to light his machine.

The 1927 section is five bays wide; the 1929 portion is ten bays wide. Both sections have subtle polychrome, wire-cut facing brick, and concrete and steel construction. The 1927 portion has a stepped-parapet roofline with concrete coping, while the mill’s 1929 part has a simple, crenellated roofline with the crenellation most defined above the entrances and along the stair tower at the southeast corner. Fenestration in both sections consists of large multi-paned steel frame windows, some of which have been bricked in on the first story. The bays are defined by projecting brick pilasters with stone caps. A water table of curved cast-concrete runs beneath each window bay. The rear elevation features the same windows and pilasters. The first story bay on the southeast end of the rear (southwest) elevation is of glass block. Restrained decorative elements include: simple door surrounds of single rows of headers with concrete corner blocks; diamond-shaped concrete panels; date stones set in both the 1927 and 1929 sections; stone and concrete window sills; stone pediments above the main entrances in both sections engraved with “NEBEL KNITTING CO.;” and decorative copper canopies sheltering the two doorways in the 1929 portion.

Historical Background

The Nebel Knitting Company was established in Charlotte in 1923 by William Nebel (1887-1971), a native of Germany and third-generation hosiery knitter. Nebel emigrated to the United States in 1905, and worked in several textile concerns in New York and New Jersey before moving to Charlotte to launch his own company. A full-fledged knitter since the age of twelve, Nebel was an innovator in hosiery styles, colors, and patterns, and held at least sixteen structural and design patents (Nebel Knitting Company Collection).

The Nebel Knitting Company prospered and expanded its production during the 1920s. From the first operation, with two sets of machinery located on the second floor of a small building on East Kingston Street, Nebel, in 1925, moved to a building at 1822-24 South Boulevard, in the industrial sector of Charlotte’s Dilworth neighborhood. This building still stands, though substantially altered and adaptively reused for shops and a restaurant. In 1927, further expansion of the business led to the construction of a new and larger Nebel Knitting Mill, near the middle of the 100 block of West Worthington Avenue. In 1929, this facility was more than doubled in size, creating the main plant that dominates the southwest corner of West Worthington and Camden Road.

William Nebel commissioned Richard C. Biberstein, noted Charlotte architect and engineer, to design both sections of the 1927-1929 mill complex (Nebel Knitting Company Collection). Biberstein (1859-1931) specialized in mill architecture and was reputed to have designed more cotton mills in the Carolina Piedmont than any other individual (Huffman 1984). Biberstein studied mechanical engineering at Worcester (Massachusetts) Polytechnic Institute between 1879 and 1882. He moved to Charlotte in 1887, and worked as a draftsman-engineer for the Charlotte Machine Company before gaining employment with Stuart W. Cramer in 1902. Cramer’s engineering firm designed and built many mills in this region, including the 1903 Highland Park No. 3 (National Register 1989). About 1905, Biberstein went into business for himself as a mill engineer and architect with offices in the Piedmont Building on Tryon Street. His career blossomed with the textile industry in this region. Among the mills Biberstein designed were the Lancaster (South Carolina) Cotton Mill, the Boger and Crawford Mill in Lincoln County, the Mooresville Cotton Mills, the Union Cotton Mill in Mount Holly, the Hudson Cotton Mills and the Dixon Mills in Gaston County, and the Larkwood Hosiery Mill in North Charlotte. Biberstein also designed other mills for Nebel, including one in Jacksonville, Florida (Huffman 1984).

When R. C. Biberstein died in 1931, his architecture firm, which still exists under the name Biberstein, Bowles, Meacham and Reed, was taken over by his son, Herman V. Biberstein (1893-1966. It was H. V. Biberstein who designed the final expansion of the Nebel Knitting Mill, an Art Moderne wing completed at a cost of about $150,000 in 1946 (Charlotte News, December 12, 1945). This addition, which is not included in the present nomination, was designed essentially as a separate building, attached to the 1927 portion by a covered passageway for trucks. Subsequently, this truck passage was walled in. As part of the renovation in progress, the roof and walls that joined the two sections of the mill have been removed.

The largest and most productive hosiery concern in Mecklenburg County, the Nebel Knitting Mill, by World War II, employed approximately 350 workers at thirty-eight machines for producing nylon full-fashioned stockings. During the 1940s, the company began an aggressive national advertising campaign, including layouts in fashion magazines such as Vogue and Seventeen. The company also followed the lead of other large textile concerns of the Carolinas and maintained an office in the Empire State Building. A 1953 newspaper article on the Nebel Mill stated that the factory’s production ranked it “among the largest hosiery mills in the Southeast.” The article proclaimed that “Nebel and nylons are two words often spoken by the nation’s retail merchants” (The Charlotte News, November 14, 1953). By 1968, the Nebel company employed almost 600 operatives and produced approximately two million dozen pairs of hosiery annually (Knitting Industry 1968). The Nebel Knitting Mill remained in operation until 1968, when it was acquired by Chadbourn, Inc., a Charlotte-based hosiery and apparel manufacturer. The building was last used by the Mecklenburg Manufacturing Company, producers of children’s knitwear (Van Hecke 1989). This firm closed its doors in 1989. The property is currently owned by Old Spaghetti Warehouse, Inc. of Garland, Texas. This company is renovating the 1927-1929 building for use as a restaurant. The 1946 addition stands vacant, and plans for this building are currently undecided.

 

 

Historical Overview
 

Completed between 1927 and 1929, the (former) Nebel Knitting Mill is significant as a tangible reminder of Charlotte’s hosiery manufacturing, which rose to prominence during the post-World War I period. The growth of knit-goods manufacturing in the 1920s and early 1930s reflected the diversification of the textile industry, which ventured into new areas of production in efforts to survive the postwar decline in production, as well as to meet the growing demand for women’s full-fashioned hose (Hall, et al. 1987, 237-288; Manufacturers Record 1926, 49-50; 1929, 80-81). By 1931, there were thirty-two hosiery mills in Burlington, North Carolina, and sixteen plants in High Point (Hall, et al. 1987, 255). The status of Charlotte as a textile center and the boom town of the Carolinas in the 1920s made it an attractive location for full-fashioned hosiery mills. The city contained five hosiery mills by the early 1930s, concentrated along the Southern Railroad corridor in Dilworth’s industrial section: Larkwood Hosiery Mill; Hudson Silk Hosiery Mill; Charlotte Knitting Mill; Okey Hosiery Mill; and the Nebel Knitting Mill (Charlotte City Directory 1935). The Nebel mill, which had expanded and relocated to its present site directly north of the Southern Railroad tracks in 1927-1929, was the largest of this group.

The demand for form-fitting hose brought unprecedented income to hosiery employees, whose real earnings rose about thirty-five percent between 1923 and 1929. The vast majority of hosiery workers were highly skilled, and the labor was physically easier and cleaner than most work in the cotton mills. Hosiery mills produced none of the cotton dust that caused brown lung nor the cotton lint that led to the derogatory nickname “linthead.” As employees with comparatively high wages and prestige, hosiery operatives rarely lived in mill villages; and typical of the hosiery companies in Charlotte and the region, the Nebel mill did not include an affiliated village. Rather, its workers dwelled in a variety of neighborhoods, commuting to work by automobile or by the trolley, which ran down South Boulevard, near the cluster of hosiery mills there (Nebel Knitting Company Collection).

Even during the Depression, the region’s hosiery concerns continued to operate at a steady pace, forming an oasis of prosperity in the sluggish textile industry” (Hall, et. al. 1987, 255; McGregor 1965, 6-7). The Nebel mill, indeed, ran steadily throughout the 1930s, and according to William Nebel, his firm never experienced a year with a financial loss (Nebel Knitting Company Collection).

 


Bibliography

Biberstein Collection. Architectural plans, building specifications, correspondence relating to the Bibersteins’ firms work for William Nebel. The Collection is available at the University of North Carolina-Charlotte, Special Collections, Charlotte, NC.

Charlotte News. Charlotte, North Carolina. 1945, 1953.

Hall, Jacquelyn Dowd, et al. 1987. Like a Family: The Making of a Southern Cotton Mill World. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Hanchett, Thomas W. 1986. “Charlotte and Its Neighborhoods: Growth of a New South City, 1850-1930. An Unpublished manuscript available at the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Landmarks Commission, Charlotte, NC.

Hill’s Charlotte City Directory. Richmond, Virginia: Hill Directory Company. 1922, 1923-1924, 1929, 1935.

Huffman, William H. 1984. “Survey and Research Report on the Biberstein House.” Unpublished report on file at the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Landmarks Commission, Charlotte, NC.

Insurance Map of Charlotte, North Carolina. 1929. New York: Sanborn Insurance Company.

Manufacturers Record. 1926, 1929.

McGregor, C. H. 1965. The Hosiery Manufacturing Industry in North Carolina and its Marketing Problems. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Graduate School of Business, Research Paper 15.

Nebel Knitting Company Collection. Memos, newspaper clippings pertaining to the Nebel Knitting Company in Charlotte. The Collection is available at the University of North Carolina-Charlotte, Special Collections, Charlotte, NC

Sieg, Elva. 1968. “Success Formula of Knitter, 81, is Work Plus Talent.” Knitting Industry. 8 (1968): 49,56.

Van Hecke, M. S. “Old Knitting Plant Bows Out.” The Charlotte Observer. August 10, 1989.


Name and location of the property: The property known as the Calvin and Margaret Neal House is located at 612 Walnut Avenue in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Name and address of the current owner(s) of the property:

The current owners of the property are:

John Caratelli and David Greer

612 Walnut Avenue

Charlotte, NC

Telephone: (704) 331-0120

  1. Representative photographs of the property: This report contains representative photographs of the property.
  2. A map depicting the location of the property: This report contains a map depicting the location of the property:
  3. Current deed book reference to the property: The most recent deed to the property can be found in Mecklenburg County Deed Book 3994, p. 713. The tax parcel number for the property is 071-021-41.
  4. A brief historical sketch of the property: This report contains a brief historical sketch of the property prepared by Emily D. Ramsey.
  5. A brief architectural description of the property: This report contains a brief architectural description of the property prepared by Emily D. Ramsey.
  6. Documentation of why and in what ways the property meets the criteria for designation set forth in N.C.G.S. 160A-400.5.
  • Special significance in terms of its history, architecture, and/or cultural

importance. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission judges that the Calvin and Margaret Neal House possesses special significance in terms of Charlotte-Mecklenburg. The Commission bases its judgment on the following considerations:

  1. The Calvin and Margaret Neal House, constructed in 1927, is an unusual and excellently-preserved example of early twentieth-century rubble stone veneer in Charlotte. The house, one of only approximately 22 rubble stone veneer houses built in the city between 1920 and the early 1940s, is an unusual mix of architectural detailing, and, unlike most of its stone contemporaries, every major exterior feature of the house (including the front portico and porte-cochere) is covered entirely in fieldstone.
  2. The Neal House is the only stone rubble house in the Wesley Heights neighborhood, a 1920s Charlotte suburb characterized by its homogenous housing stock, and is a testament to the high level of craftsmanship possible in what would otherwise be considered a common vernacular structure.
  3. The Neal House, constructed most likely from stock plans, is a tangible reflection of the way in which homeowners during the twentieth century post-war housing boom found ways to individualize their homes. The unusual and striking use of masonry (both in the stonework walls and the unique brick detailing around windows and doors) in the Neal House reflects the care with which Calvin Neal oversaw the construction of his home.
  • Integrity of design, workmanship, materials, feeling, and association.

The Commission contends that the architectural description prepared by Emily D. Ramsey demonstrates that the Calvin and Margaret Neal House meets this criterion.

  1. Ad Valorem Tax Appraisal: The Commission is aware that designation would allow the owner to apply for an automatic deferral of 50% of the Ad Valorem taxes on all or any portion of the property that becomes a designated “historic landmark.” The current appraised value of the house and two-story garage apartment is $54,710. The appraised value of the .189-acre lot is $7,500.

Date of preparation of this report:

February 1, 2003

Prepared by:

Emily D. Ramsey

2436 N. Albany Ave., #1

Chicago, IL 60647

Statement of Significance

The Calvin and Margaret Neal House

612 Walnut Avenue

Charlotte, NC

Summary

The Calvin and Margaret Neal House, erected in 1927, is a structure that possesses local historic significance as a rare and excellently preserved example of early stone rubble veneer construction in Charlotte and as the only stone house in the Wesley Heights neighborhood. The decade between the end of World War I and the beginning of the Great Depression in 1929 were years of significant economic and physical growth in Charlotte and throughout the country. Although advances in building technology during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century made building materials like wood, glass, and brick more affordable and widely available to even the humblest homeowner, stone was still seen as a costly and extravagant material within the building trade—a material meant for imposing civic and commercial structures, but rarely used for residential buildings. The popularity of the Arts and Crafts Movement, which emphasized the use of local, natural materials in building, brought stone into residential areas, but it was most commonly used only as a decorative accent on porches and chimneys. Brick and wood were cheaper, easier to build with, and more widely available. Consequently, even during the post-World War I building boom, a time of unprecedented growth for Charlotte and Mecklenburg County, only around 20-25 rubble stone residences (a tiny percentage of the total number of houses built) were constructed within the city.1 The Neal house is an unusual example of a type of construction rarely seen in Charlotte; and, within the context of the conservative, white-collar Wesley Heights neighborhood, its exuberant rubble façade breaks through the uniformity of the suburb’s standard brick and frame residences.

The Neal House, most likely constructed from stock plans, is also significant as a tangible reflection of the way in which middle-class homeowners during the twentieth century post-war housing boom found ways to individualize their homes without the expense of employing an architect. The unusual and striking use of masonry—both in the nine-inch-thick stone walls and the unique brick details around the house’s windows and doors—reflects the degree of craftsmanship that went into the house, and the care with which Calvin Neal oversaw the construction of his first and only home. What would have been considered a rather ordinary example of a twentieth century vernacular form takes on a completely different character when rendered in irregular, colorful fieldstone. The simple massing of the house, the front portico, and porte-cochere, accented with graceful arched entryways and side openings, serves to highlight, but not distract from, the beauty of the natural materials.

Historical Background Statement

The Calvin Neal House, like most of the houses constructed during the 1920s in Charlotte’s burgeoning suburbs, was part of a post-World War I building boom that peaked in the middle of the decade and ended with the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and the beginning of the Great Depression. Charlotte had arisen during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries as a shining example of the New South. By the time the U.S. entered into World War I, local historian Thomas Hanchett writes:

Charlotte…was the headquarters of a large textile region, with a diversified economic base including banking, power generation and wholesaling. A bustling mass transit system, the backbone of big-city growth, now served an expanding ring of suburbs. In the 1910 census Charlotte…finally overtook the port of Wilmington to become North Carolina’s largest city, symbolizing the shift in the state’s economy from cotton and tobacco export to textile production.2

Although such rapid expansion slowed during wartime, the end of the war in 1919 ushered in another period of growth for Charlotte, characterized particularly by the development of middle-class automobile suburbs like Wesley Heights. The city’s pre-war prosperity had given rise to the first generation of Charlotte suburbs—carefully planned mixtures of mansions and more modest middle class housing with public recreation spaces and, in the case of Dilworth, even an industrial corridor included. All of these suburbs were connected to the center city by a web of streetcar lines. By contrast, suburbs that were developing in the 1920s (and, to a larger degree, during the post-World War II period) tended to be strictly residential, segregated by economic class, and dependent more on the automobile than on the streetcar.3

The earliest example of this new type of Charlotte suburb is the Wesley Heights neighborhood. Plans for a suburban development began on what was originally the Wadsworth family farm northwest of the center city as early as 1911. However, active development of the land did not begin until 1920, when C. B. Bryant and local developer E. C. Griffith formed the Charlotte Investment Company and bought the tract for $200,000 from the Wadsworth Land Company. The Charlotte Investment Company “redrew the original 1911 survey plat, laid out the lots, and added improvements, such as sidewalks and public utilities.” 4 They named the new suburb Wesley Heights, and began selling lots in December 1921. The E. C. Griffith Company encouraged brisk lot sales and rapid construction of homes on these lots by offering incentives, discounts, and special financing for early buyers. The response was so encouraging that the Charlotte Investment Company decided to expand the boundaries of the development. A tract lying between the Piedmont and Northern tracks and West Morehead Street was hastily plotted. Principal streets like Walnut Avenue were extended southward, but no cross streets or alleyways were laid so that lot sales and home construction could begin immediately. Deed covenants regulating setback, fencing, cost of construction, and other variables assured that the entire suburb would maintain some degree of cohesion.5

Such precautions, coupled with the neighborhood’s relatively rapid development and the growing preference among the middle-class for stock house plans in lieu of architect-designed homes, gave Wesley Heights a much more homogenous streetscape than most of Charlotte’s earlier suburbs. Dilworth, Elizabeth, and Myers Park had developed over the course of several decades. The architecture of the houses in these suburbs (many of which were drawn up by professional architects) reflected changing styles over time. Wesley Heights, in contrast, was a neighborhood made up almost exclusively of similar bungalows, Tudor Revival cottages, and Colonial Revival homes constructed of brick and wood. Fully two-thirds of the homes in Wesley Heights were constructed between 1921 and 1930.6

It was during this period that Calvin A. Neal bought a lot on Walnut Avenue and began the process of building a home for his wife, Margaret, and their growing family. The new suburb was a perfect fit for the Neals—Margaret Severs Neal was the granddaughter of Henry C. Severs, who had developed the small enclave of middle-class white housing known as Seversville, just south of Johnson C. Smith University, around the turn of the century.7 Margaret’s family was deeply rooted in the northwest side of the city, and the Neals had been living with one of Margaret’s relatives on Tuckaseegee Road before deciding to move to nearby Wesley Heights. Calvin Neal, a native of Charlotte, had worked his way from meter-reader to bookkeeper and accountant at the Southern Power and Utilities Company (later known as Duke Power) during the 1920s. Margaret worked for Efird’s department store as a clerk until the birth of the couple’s first child, Doris Jean, in 1927.

By that time, the Neals had saved enough to build a home of their own. The Moretz Reality Company signed the building permit for the house, which was most likely constructed using one of many stock plans owned by the company.8 The plan of the house itself was simple, with hardly any decorative detailing. To make the house distinctive from the brick Colonials and frame bungalows going up in the neighborhood, Calvin Neal decided that his home would be clad entirely in rustic rubble fieldstone—the first, and only, stone house that would be built in Wesley Heights.9 The stone was delivered by rail on the Piedmont and Northern line, which ran through Wesley Heights and crossed Walnut Avenue just north of the Neal’s lot. Construction proceeded through 1927 on the modest single-family residence; but the Moretz Reality Company went out of business in 1928 and the Neals had to hire another contractor to finish the exterior stonework.10

The family had barely gotten settled into their new home when the Great Depression hit in 1929. Though Calvin Neal managed to keep his job with Duke Power, the company reduced his salary several times. To help make the monthly payments on their house, the Neals rented out their front bedroom during the 1930s.11 By 1936, the family had grown to include two young sons, Donald and Jerry. The Neals continued to live in the house through the 1940s and 1950s. In 1946, frustrated by the lack of housing in the area after the war and needing a place of their own, Doris Jean and her husband asked brother Donald to draw up plans for a two-story garage apartment that could be built on the rear of their parents’ lot. The simple frame structure remains on the property. It is no longer occupied, and the first floor garage opening has been replaced with a sliding glass door.

Calvin Neal retired from Duke Power in 1965; he died just one year later. Margaret Neal continued to live at 612 Walnut Avenue until 1977. The house was sold to the Dean family, who lived in the house until November of 2001, when they sold the house to John Caratelli and David Greer. Caratelli and Greer have recently finished restoring the exterior and interior of the house, utilizing National Register tax credits and adhering to the standards for restoration and rehabilitation set forth by the Secretary of the Interior.

Architectural Description and Context Statement

Architecturally, the Calvin and Margaret Neal House is significant as a rare and excellently preserved example of early twentieth-century rubble stone veneer in Charlotte. The use of masonry, and stone in particular, as a building material carries with it ideas of solidity and permanence that were established throughout North Carolina and most of the South as early as the mid-nineteenth century, when many towns and cities began the process of replacing “‘ephemeral’ wood buildings and ‘unsightly wooden shanties’” with solid, handsome masonry structures. As historian Charlotte V. Brown writes in Architects and Builders In North Carolina: A History of the Practice of Building, this shift from wood to masonry “was considered an especially significant accomplishment in a town’s effort to gain a ‘City-like appearance.’” In the hierarchy of building materials, stone was at the top—towns took “special pride in construction of stone buildings.”12 It was considered “the king of building materials.”13 By the end of the nineteenth century, as rail lines expanded and the production of most building materials became increasingly mechanized, products such as dressed lumber, brick, and glass became more affordable and readily available to even the most modest homebuilders. Stone, however, was still seen as a costly and extravagant material within the building trade—a material meant for imposing civic or commercial structures, but rarely used for common residential buildings.

The popularity of the Arts and Crafts Movement, which emphasized the informal use of local, natural materials in building, brought rubble stone into residential areas of Charlotte during the 1920s and 1930s, but it was most commonly used only as a decorative accent on porches and chimneys.14 Even after the technique of veneering stone onto wood-framed structures was perfected in the late 1910s, “allowing smaller versions of stone houses [like the Neal House] to be built in middle-class suburbs throughout the country,” very few stone houses were built in the Charlotte area.15 A survey of stone rubble houses in Charlotte completed by Mary Beth Gatza in the fall of 2002 uncovered only twenty-two existing stone rubble houses built between 1920 and 1942. Stone rubble houses represent a minute percentage of the houses built during the city’s post-World War I building boom—a period of prosperity from which “large portions of present day Charlotte date.”16 Most of these stone structures are bungalows or Craftsman style houses with rubble stone exterior foundations and walls accented by wooden porch supports, dormers, and detailing, such as the houses at 320 Tuckaseegee Road, 509 Sylvania Avenue, and 2204-06 Roslyn Avenue. A few, such as 2325 Crescent Avenue and 2531 Commonwealth Avenue, use stone in conjunction with painted half-timbering details and steeply gabled entryways with rounded door openings associated with the Tudor Revival style. Later examples, like the ones at 4915 Monroe Road and 203 Karendale Avenue, are basic rectangular, side-gable structures clad in rubble stone (See Appendix).

Although the Neal House is most likely not architect-designed and does not strictly adhere to any particular style of architecture, the house is a thoughtfully-executed structure with an unusual mix of simple decorative details—including a Greek Revival-influenced front pediment, unique red-brick window and door surrounds, and graceful rounded-arch openings on the front portico and porte-cochere—that are enhanced by the application of the irregular stonework. The Neal House is also unique in that, unlike most of the stone rubble houses in Charlotte, every major exterior feature of the house (including walls, portico and porte-cochere) is covered entirely in fieldstone. The use of concrete and brick in place of wood around the windows and doors are unusual accents to the all-masonry exterior. What would have been considered a rather ordinary example of a twentieth-century vernacular form takes on a completely different character when rendered in colorful and decorative masonry. In this way, the house remains a tangible reminder of how middle class homeowners like the Neals found ways to personalize stock plans without the expense incurred by employing an architect.

The Neal House, located at 612 Walnut Avenue in the Wesley Heights neighborhood in northwest Charlotte, is a one-story rectangular frame structure clad in rough rubble stone (ranging in color from light brown to deep orange and dark blue-gray) set with raised mortar joints. The building’s roofline features a pedimented façade, a center cross gable, and a hipped roof in the rear. The house has three chimneys, all covered in the same rubble stone as the house. The house retains all of its original six-over-six wood windows. The façade of the house includes one set of paired windows and one set of three windows, each separated by wide concrete mullions. The front portico features rounded-arch openings on each side, and a rounded-arch entryway framing the main entrance to the house. A substantial porte-cochere on the south (side) elevation also features arched openings on each side. A side driveway leads through the porte-cochere and to the 1946 two-story frame garage apartment behind the house. A small enclosed frame porch set on a large rubble stone foundation extends from the back of the house (west elevation) off of the kitchen. Current owners John Caratelli and David Greer, as part of an extensive restoration of the house, have restored the bead board ceilings in the portico and porte-cochere, renovated the deteriorated back porch, replaced the front door with one more closely resembling the original door, and restored the original doorway on the north elevation off of the dining room (which had been turned into a closet by the previous owner). The exterior of the house remains almost exactly as it was when it was completed in the late 1920s.

The Neal House interior is laid out on a simple floor plan—a living room and dining room (separated by original French doors), breakfast nook and kitchen on the north, and two bedrooms, a bathroom, and a front den (separated from the main living space by French doors) on the south side. The interior features three fireplaces, each one of a different material based on the importance of the room. The primary fireplace in the living room is surrounded by an impressive mantel of blue-gray rubble granite; the fireplace in the den has a painted brick surround capped with a simple wooden mantel, and the front bedroom features a light, almost delicate painted wooden fireplace surround. Although the kitchen and bathroom have been updated, the owners have taken care to preserve even the smallest original details, including the medicine cabinet and sink in the bathroom, the glass doorknobs and metal hardware on the interior doors, and original light fixtures above the granite fireplace and in the breakfast nook. The Neal House is an excellently preserved example of a building technique that is rare in Charlotte-Mecklenburg, and it remains a structure unique to the Wesley Heights neighborhood.

1 See Appendix. This number comes from a survey of stone rubble houses completed by Mary Beth Gatza in the fall of 2002. Ms. Gatza located 22 extant stone rubble houses (including the Neal House) in Charlotte dating from 1921 to 1942. Of these, 13 were constructed after 1930, and only two examples (a house constructed in 1921 at 726 Bromley Road and the Seversville house at 315 Tuckaseegee, built c. 1925) predate the Neal House. Indeed, 192 7 saw the greatest concentration of stone houses built— four in all, including the Neal House.

2 Thomas Hanchett, “The Growth of Charlotte: A History,” (Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission, www.cmhpf.org).

3 Ibid. Mary Beth Gatza, National Register Nomination for the Wesley Heights Historic District, Mecklenburg Co., NC (Division of Archives and History, Raleigh, NC: 1995) 8.1-8.3.

4 Gatza, National Register Nomination for the Wesley Heights Historic District, 8.4-8.5.

5 Ibid.

6 Ibid, 8.7.

7 A Brief History of the Severs Family (Charlotte: 1943), 3-4. Margaret’s brother, W. A. Severs, built a house on Walnut Avenue as well, just a few houses down at 532 Walnut.

8 Charlotte City Directory, 1916-1929. Building Permit dated July 25, 1927. McCoy Moretz, the founder and president of Moretz Reality, had worked for E. C. Griffith Company in the late 1910s and had served briefly as the company’s vice president before forming his own company in 1922.

9 The house in nearby Seversville where the Neals had lived before moving to Walnut Avenue is a Craftsman style house that featured stone rubble walls. The house was built around 1925, and may have influenced Neal’s decision to build a stone house.

10 Donald Neal, interview with Emily Ramsey on January 14, 2003.

11 Ibid.

12 Catherine W. Bisher, Charlotte V. Brown, Carl R. Lounsbury, and Ernest H. Wood III, Architects and Builders in North Carolina: A History of the Practice of Building (Chapel Hill: 1997), p.137.

13 Ernest Flagg, Small Houses, their economic design and construction: essays on the fundamental principles of design and descriptive articles on construction (New York: 1922).

14 Although most of Charlotte’s bungalows were not built using stone, practically all of the stone houses that were built in the city during the post-World War I period were bungalows or Craftsman style houses, and include some of the best examples of the housing type in Mecklenburg County. 2144 Park Road is an excellent example of a Japanese-inspired bungalow, while the stone house a 724 Edgehill Road features the curved, organic lines and rounded features of an English-cottage-inspired bungalow.

15 Lee Goff, Stone Built: Contemporary American Houses (New York: 1997), 27.

16 Hanchett.

  1. Name and location of the property: The property known as the Calvin and Margaret Neal House is located at 612 Walnut Avenue in Charlotte, North Carolina.
  2. Name and address of the current owner(s) of the property:

The current owners of the property are:

John Caratelli and David Greer

612 Walnut Avenue

Charlotte, NC

            Telephone:  (704) 331-0120

  1. Representative photographs of the property:  This report contains representative photographs of the property.

 

  1. A map depicting the location of the property:  This report contains a map depicting the location of the property:
  1. Current deed book reference to the property:  The most recent deed to the property can be found in Mecklenburg County Deed Book 3994, p. 713.  The tax parcel number for the property is 071-021-41.

 

  1. A brief historical sketch of the property:  This report contains a brief historical sketch of the property prepared by Emily D. Ramsey.

 

  1. A brief architectural description of the property:  This report contains a brief architectural description of the property prepared by Emily D. Ramsey.

 

  1. Documentation of why and in what ways the property meets the criteria for designation set forth in N.C.G.S. 160A-400.5.

 

    1. Special significance in terms of its history, architecture, and/or cultural

importance.  The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission judges that the Calvin and Margaret Neal House possesses special significance in terms of Charlotte-Mecklenburg.  The Commission bases its judgment on the following considerations:

 

  1. The Calvin and Margaret Neal House, constructed in 1927, is an unusual and excellently-preserved example of early twentieth-century rubble stone veneer in Charlotte.  The house, one of only approximately 22 rubble stone veneer houses built in the city between 1920 and the early 1940s, is an unusual mix of architectural detailing, and, unlike most of its stone contemporaries, every major exterior feature of the house (including the front portico and porte-cochere) is covered entirely in fieldstone.
  2. The Neal House is the only stone rubble house in the Wesley Heights neighborhood, a 1920s Charlotte suburb characterized by its homogenous housing stock, and is a testament to the high level of craftsmanship possible in what would otherwise be considered a common vernacular structure.
  3. The Neal House, constructed most likely from stock plans, is a tangible reflection of the way in which homeowners during the twentieth century post-war housing boom found ways to individualize their homes.  The unusual and striking use of masonry (both in the stonework walls and the unique brick detailing around windows and doors) in the Neal House reflects the care with which Calvin Neal oversaw the construction of his home.

 

    1. Integrity of design, workmanship, materials, feeling, and association.

The Commission contends that the architectural description prepared by Emily D. Ramsey demonstrates that the Calvin and Margaret Neal House meets this criterion.

  1. Ad Valorem Tax Appraisal:  The Commission is aware that designation would allow the owner to apply for an automatic deferral of 50% of  the Ad Valorem taxes on all or any portion of the property that becomes a designated “historic landmark.”  The current appraised value of the house and two-story garage apartment is $54,710.  The appraised value of the .189-acre lot is $7,500.

Date of preparation of this report:

February 1, 2003

Prepared by:

            Emily D. Ramsey

            2436 N. Albany Ave., #1

            Chicago, IL 60647

Statement of Significance

The Calvin and Margaret Neal House

612 Walnut Avenue

Charlotte, NC

 Summary

The Calvin and Margaret Neal House, erected in 1927, is a structure that possesses local historic significance as a rare and excellently preserved example of early stone rubble veneer construction in Charlotte and as the only stone house in the Wesley Heights neighborhood.  The decade between the end of World War I and the beginning of the Great Depression in 1929 were years of significant economic and physical growth in Charlotte and throughout the country.  Although advances in building technology during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century made building materials like wood, glass, and brick more affordable and widely available to even the humblest homeowner, stone was still seen as a costly and extravagant material within the building trade—a material meant for imposing civic and commercial structures, but rarely used for residential buildings.  The popularity of the Arts and Crafts Movement, which emphasized the use of local, natural materials in building, brought stone into residential areas, but it was most commonly used only as a decorative accent on porches and chimneys.  Brick and wood were cheaper, easier to build with, and more widely available.  Consequently, even during the post-World War I building boom, a time of unprecedented growth for Charlotte and Mecklenburg County, only around 20-25 rubble stone residences (a tiny percentage of the total number of houses built) were constructed within the city.1  The Neal house is an unusual example of a type of construction rarely seen in Charlotte; and, within the context of the conservative, white-collar Wesley Heights neighborhood, its exuberant rubble façade breaks through the uniformity of the suburb’s standard brick and frame residences.

The Neal House, most likely constructed from stock plans, is also significant as a tangible reflection of the way in which middle-class homeowners during the twentieth century post-war housing boom found ways to individualize their homes without the expense of employing an architect.  The unusual and striking use of masonry—both in the nine-inch-thick stone walls and the unique brick details around the house’s windows and doors—reflects the degree of craftsmanship that went into the house, and the care with which Calvin Neal oversaw the construction of his first and only home.  What would have been considered a rather ordinary example of a twentieth century vernacular form takes on a completely different character when rendered in irregular, colorful fieldstone.  The simple massing of the house, the front portico, and porte-cochere, accented with graceful arched entryways and side openings, serves to highlight, but not distract from, the beauty of the natural materials.              

Historical Background Statement

The Calvin Neal House, like most of the houses constructed during the 1920s in Charlotte’s burgeoning suburbs, was part of a post-World War I building boom that peaked in the middle of the decade and ended with the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and the beginning of the Great Depression.  Charlotte had arisen during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries as a shining example of the New South.  By the time the U.S. entered into World War I, local historian Thomas Hanchett writes:

 

Charlotte…was the headquarters of a large textile region, with a diversified economic base including banking, power generation and wholesaling.  A bustling mass transit system, the backbone of big-city growth, now served an expanding ring of suburbs.  In the 1910 census Charlotte…finally overtook the port of Wilmington to become North Carolina’s largest city, symbolizing the shift in the state’s economy from cotton and tobacco export to textile production.2

 

Although such rapid expansion slowed during wartime, the end of the war in 1919 ushered in another period of growth for Charlotte, characterized particularly by the development of middle-class automobile suburbs like Wesley Heights.  The city’s pre-war prosperity had given rise to the first generation of Charlotte suburbs—carefully planned mixtures of mansions and more modest middle class housing with public recreation spaces and, in the case of Dilworth, even an industrial corridor included.  All of these suburbs were connected to the center city by a web of streetcar lines.  By contrast, suburbs that were developing in the 1920s (and, to a larger degree, during the post-World War II period) tended to be strictly residential, segregated by economic class, and dependent more on the automobile than on the streetcar.3

The earliest example of this new type of Charlotte suburb is the Wesley Heights neighborhood.  Plans for a suburban development began on what was originally the Wadsworth family farm northwest of the center city as early as 1911.  However, active development of the land did not begin until 1920, when C. B. Bryant and local developer E. C. Griffith formed the Charlotte Investment Company and bought the tract for $200,000 from the Wadsworth Land Company.  The Charlotte Investment Company “redrew the original 1911 survey plat, laid out the lots, and added improvements, such as sidewalks and public utilities.” 4  They named the new suburb Wesley Heights, and began selling lots in December 1921.  The E. C. Griffith Company encouraged brisk lot sales and rapid construction of homes on these lots by offering incentives, discounts, and special financing for early buyers.  The response was so encouraging that the Charlotte Investment Company  decided to expand the boundaries of the development.  A tract lying between the Piedmont and Northern tracks and West Morehead Street was hastily plotted.  Principal streets like Walnut Avenue were extended southward, but no cross streets or alleyways were laid so that lot sales and home construction could begin immediately.  Deed covenants regulating setback, fencing, cost of construction, and other variables assured that the entire suburb would maintain some degree of cohesion.5

Such precautions, coupled with the neighborhood’s relatively rapid development and the growing preference among the middle-class for stock house plans in lieu of architect-designed homes, gave Wesley Heights a much more homogenous streetscape than most of Charlotte’s earlier suburbs.  Dilworth, Elizabeth, and Myers Park had developed over the course of several decades. The architecture of the houses in these suburbs (many of which were drawn up by professional architects) reflected changing styles over time.  Wesley Heights, in contrast, was a neighborhood made up almost exclusively of similar bungalows, Tudor Revival cottages, and Colonial Revival homes constructed of brick and wood.  Fully two-thirds of the homes in Wesley Heights were constructed between 1921 and 1930.6

It was during this period that Calvin A. Neal bought a lot on Walnut Avenue and began the process of building a home for his wife, Margaret, and their growing family.  The new suburb was a perfect fit for the Neals—Margaret Severs Neal was the granddaughter of Henry C. Severs, who had developed the small enclave of middle-class white housing known as Seversville, just south of Johnson C. Smith University, around the turn of the century.7  Margaret’s family was deeply rooted in the northwest side of the city, and the Neals had been living with one of Margaret’s relatives on Tuckaseegee Road before deciding to move to nearby Wesley Heights.  Calvin Neal, a native of Charlotte, had worked his way from meter-reader to bookkeeper and accountant at the Southern Power and Utilities Company (later known as Duke Power) during the 1920s.  Margaret worked for Efird’s department store as a clerk until the birth of the couple’s first child, Doris Jean, in 1927.

By that time, the Neals had saved enough to build a home of their own.  The Moretz Reality Company signed the building permit for the house, which was most likely constructed using one of  many stock plans owned by the company.8  The plan of the house itself was simple, with hardly any decorative detailing.  To make the house distinctive from the brick Colonials and frame bungalows going up in the neighborhood, Calvin Neal decided that his home would be clad entirely in rustic rubble fieldstone—the first, and only, stone house that would be built in Wesley Heights.9    The stone was delivered by rail on the Piedmont and Northern line, which ran through Wesley Heights and crossed Walnut Avenue just north of the Neal’s lot.  Construction proceeded through 1927 on the modest single-family residence; but the Moretz Reality Company went out of business in 1928 and the Neals had to hire another contractor to finish the exterior stonework.10

The family had barely gotten settled into their new home when the Great Depression hit in 1929.  Though Calvin Neal managed to keep his job with Duke Power, the company reduced his salary several times.  To help make the monthly payments on their house, the Neals rented out their front bedroom during the 1930s.11  By 1936, the family had grown to include two young sons, Donald and Jerry.  The Neals continued to live in the house through the 1940s and 1950s.  In 1946, frustrated by the lack of housing in the area after the war and needing a place of their own, Doris Jean and her husband asked brother Donald to draw up plans for a two-story garage apartment that could be built on the rear of their parents’ lot.  The simple frame structure  remains on the property.  It is no longer occupied, and the first floor garage opening has been replaced with a sliding glass door.

Calvin Neal retired from Duke Power in 1965; he died just one year later.  Margaret Neal continued to live at 612 Walnut Avenue until 1977.  The house was sold to the Dean family, who lived in the house until  November of 2001, when they sold the house to John Caratelli and David Greer.  Caratelli and Greer have recently finished restoring the exterior and interior of the house, utilizing National Register tax credits and adhering to the standards for restoration and rehabilitation set forth by the Secretary of the Interior.     

Architectural Description and Context Statement

Architecturally, the Calvin and Margaret Neal House is significant as a rare and excellently preserved example of early twentieth-century rubble stone veneer in Charlotte.  The use of masonry, and stone in particular, as a building material carries with it ideas of solidity and permanence that were established throughout North Carolina and most of the South as early as the mid-nineteenth century, when many towns and cities began the process of replacing “‘ephemeral’ wood buildings and ‘unsightly wooden shanties’” with solid, handsome masonry structures.  As historian Charlotte V. Brown writes in Architects and Builders In North Carolina: A History of the Practice of Building, this shift from wood to masonry “was considered an especially significant accomplishment in a town’s effort to gain a ‘City-like appearance.’”  In the hierarchy of building materials, stone was at the top—towns took “special pride in construction of stone buildings.”12  It was considered “the king of building materials.”13  By the end of the nineteenth century, as rail lines expanded and the production of most building materials became increasingly mechanized, products such as dressed lumber, brick, and glass became more affordable and readily available to even the most modest homebuilders.  Stone, however, was still seen as a costly and extravagant material within the building trade—a material meant for imposing civic or commercial structures, but rarely used for common residential buildings.

The popularity of the Arts and Crafts Movement, which emphasized the informal use of local, natural materials in building, brought rubble stone into residential areas of Charlotte during the 1920s and 1930s, but it was most commonly used only as a decorative accent on porches and chimneys.14  Even after the technique of veneering stone onto wood-framed structures was perfected in the late 1910s, “allowing smaller versions of stone houses [like the Neal House] to be built in middle-class suburbs throughout the country,” very few stone houses were built in the Charlotte area.15  A survey of stone rubble houses in Charlotte completed by Mary Beth Gatza in the fall of 2002 uncovered only twenty-two existing stone rubble houses built between 1920 and 1942.  Stone rubble houses represent a minute percentage of the houses built during the city’s post-World War I building boom—a period of prosperity from which “large portions of present day Charlotte date.”16  Most of these stone structures are bungalows or Craftsman style houses with rubble stone exterior foundations and walls accented by wooden porch supports, dormers, and detailing, such as the houses at 320 Tuckaseegee Road, 509 Sylvania Avenue, and 2204-06 Roslyn Avenue.  A few, such as 2325 Crescent Avenue and 2531 Commonwealth Avenue, use stone in conjunction with painted half-timbering details and steeply gabled entryways with rounded door openings associated with the Tudor Revival style.  Later examples, like the ones at 4915 Monroe Road and 203 Karendale Avenue, are basic rectangular, side-gable structures clad in rubble stone (See Appendix).

Although the Neal House is most likely not architect-designed and does not strictly adhere to any particular style of architecture, the house is a thoughtfully-executed structure with an unusual mix of simple decorative details—including a Greek Revival-influenced front pediment, unique red-brick  window and door surrounds, and graceful rounded-arch openings on the front portico and porte-cochere—that are enhanced by the application of the irregular stonework.  The Neal House is also unique in that, unlike most of the stone rubble houses in Charlotte, every major exterior feature of the house (including walls, portico and porte-cochere) is covered entirely in fieldstone.  The use of concrete and brick in place of wood around the windows and doors are unusual accents to the all-masonry exterior.  What would have been considered a rather ordinary example of a twentieth-century vernacular form takes on a completely different character when rendered in colorful and decorative masonry.  In this way, the house remains a tangible reminder of how middle class homeowners like the Neals found ways to personalize stock plans without the expense incurred by employing an architect.

The Neal House, located at 612 Walnut Avenue in the Wesley Heights neighborhood in northwest Charlotte, is a one-story rectangular frame structure clad in rough rubble stone (ranging in color from light brown to deep orange and dark blue-gray) set with raised mortar joints.  The building’s roofline features a pedimented façade, a center cross gable, and a hipped roof in the rear.  The house has three chimneys, all covered in the same rubble stone as the house.  The house retains all of its original six-over-six wood windows.  The façade of the house includes one set of paired windows and one set of three windows, each separated by wide concrete mullions.  The front portico features rounded-arch openings on each side, and a rounded-arch entryway framing the main entrance to the house.  A substantial porte-cochere on the south (side) elevation also features arched openings on each side.  A side driveway leads through the porte-cochere and to the 1946 two-story frame garage apartment behind the house.  A small enclosed frame porch set on a large rubble stone foundation extends from the back of the house (west elevation) off of the kitchen. Current owners John Caratelli and David Greer, as part of an extensive restoration of the house, have restored the bead board ceilings in the portico and porte-cochere, renovated the deteriorated back porch, replaced the front door with one more closely resembling the original door, and restored the original doorway on the north elevation off of the dining room (which had been turned into a closet by the previous owner).  The exterior of the house remains almost exactly as it was when it was completed in the late 1920s.

The Neal House interior is laid out on a simple floor plan—a living room and dining room (separated by original French doors), breakfast nook and kitchen on the north, and two bedrooms, a bathroom, and a front den (separated from the main living space by French doors) on the south side.  The interior features three fireplaces, each one of a different material based on the importance of the room.  The primary fireplace in the living room is surrounded by an impressive mantel of blue-gray rubble granite; the fireplace in the den has a painted brick surround capped with a simple wooden mantel, and the front bedroom features a light, almost delicate painted wooden fireplace surround.  Although the kitchen and bathroom have been updated, the owners have taken care to preserve even the smallest original details, including the medicine cabinet and sink in the bathroom, the glass doorknobs and metal hardware on the interior doors, and original light fixtures above the granite fireplace and in the breakfast nook.  The Neal House is an excellently preserved example of a building technique that is rare in Charlotte-Mecklenburg, and it remains a structure unique to the Wesley Heights neighborhood.

1 See Appendix.  This number comes from a survey of stone rubble houses completed  by Mary Beth Gatza in the fall of 2002.  Ms. Gatza located 22 extant stone rubble houses (including the Neal House) in Charlotte dating from 1921 to 1942.  Of these, 13 were constructed after 1930, and only two examples (a house constructed in 1921 at 726 Bromley Road and the Seversville house at 315 Tuckaseegee, built c. 1925)  predate the Neal House.  Indeed, 192 7 saw the greatest concentration of stone houses built— four in all, including the Neal House.

 

2 Thomas Hanchett, “The Growth of Charlotte: A History,” (Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission, www.cmhpf.org).

 

3 Ibid.  Mary Beth Gatza, National Register Nomination for the Wesley Heights Historic District, Mecklenburg Co., NC  (Division of Archives and History, Raleigh, NC: 1995) 8.1-8.3.

 

4 Gatza, National Register Nomination for the Wesley Heights Historic District, 8.4-8.5.

 

5 Ibid.

 

6 Ibid, 8.7.

 

7 A Brief History of the Severs Family (Charlotte: 1943), 3-4.  Margaret’s brother, W. A. Severs, built a house on Walnut Avenue as well, just a few houses down at 532 Walnut.

 

8 Charlotte City Directory, 1916-1929.  Building Permit dated July 25, 1927.  McCoy Moretz, the founder and president of Moretz Reality, had worked for E. C. Griffith Company in the late 1910s and had served briefly as the company’s vice president before forming his own company in 1922.

9 The house in nearby Seversville where the Neals had lived before moving to Walnut Avenue is a Craftsman style house that featured stone rubble walls.  The house was built around 1925, and may have influenced Neal’s decision to build a stone house.

 

10 Donald Neal, interview with Emily Ramsey on January 14, 2003.

 

11 Ibid.

 

12 Catherine W. Bisher, Charlotte V. Brown, Carl R. Lounsbury, and Ernest H. Wood  III,  Architects and Builders in North Carolina:  A History of the Practice of Building (Chapel Hill: 1997), p.137.

 

13 Ernest Flagg, Small Houses, their economic design and construction: essays on the fundamental principles of design and descriptive articles on construction (New York: 1922).

 

14 Although most of Charlotte’s bungalows were not built using stone, practically all of the stone houses that were built in the city during the post-World War I period were bungalows or Craftsman style houses, and include some of the best examples of the housing type in Mecklenburg County.  2144 Park Road is an excellent example of a Japanese-inspired bungalow, while the stone house a 724 Edgehill Road features the curved, organic lines and rounded features of an English-cottage-inspired bungalow.

 

15 Lee Goff, Stone Built: Contemporary American Houses (New York: 1997), 27.

 

16 Hanchett.



Click here to view Charlotte Observer Article on the Myers Park Streetcar Waiting Station

This report was written on June 4, 1980.

1. Name and location of the property: The property known as the Myers Park Streetcar Waiting Stations are situated at two locations. Two are at the intersection of East Fourth Street and Queens Road in Charlotte. One is at the intersection of Hermitage Road and Queens Rd. in Charlotte.

2. Name, address, and telephone number of the present owner of the property: The property is situated in the public right-of-way and is, therefore, owned by:

The City of Charlotte
600 E. Trade St.
Charlotte, NC 28202

Telephone: (704) 374-2241

3. Representative photographs of the property: This report contains representative photographs of the property.

4. A map depicting the location of the property: This report contains a map which depicts the location of the property.

5. Current Deed Book Reference to the property: There is no deed recorded on this specific property. There is no Tax Parcel Number assigned to this specific property.

6. A brief historical sketch of the property:

The growth and expansion of Charlotte in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were intimately bound up with the installation and development of its streetcar network. Streetcars initially appeared in charlotte in January 1887, when a horse-drawn system commenced operations.1 It was the Charlotte Consolidated Construction Company, locally known as the Four Cs which revolutionized the transportation facilities of Charlotte, however. In February 1891, the Four Cs signed a $40,000 contract with the Edison Electric Co. to construct an electric streetcar on trolley system.2 Work began in march and terminated on May 18, 1891, when the first trolley departed from Independence Square, the intersection of Trade and Tryon Sts. in the heart of Charlotte.3 The system consisted of two lines, one from the Richmond and Danville Railroad Depot Carolina Central Railroad Depot on N. Tryon St. to Latta Park in Dilworth, the streetcar suburb which the Four Cs opened May 20, 1891.4

The accessibility of residential property to the trolley system became indispensable for successful real estate ventures in Charlotte after 1891. The initial expansion of the electric streetcar network occurred in September 1900, when a line opened which extended through Fourth Ward to Elmwood Cemetery on the western edge of the city.5 In May 1901, the Four Cs began service on a line which meandered through First Ward or the northeastern quadrant of Charlotte.6 In March 1902, trolleys initiated service to Piedmont Park, Charlotte’s second streetcar suburb.7 On December 13, 1902, the Charlotte Consolidated Construction Company opened a streetcar line which extended approximately three-fourths of a mile from the intersection of East Ave. (now E. Trade St.) and McDowell St. along Elizabeth Ave. to a point three hundred feet west of the main building of Elizabeth College, thereby providing a powerful impetus for the growth of Elizabeth as an affluent residential district.8

The Elizabeth College streetcar line enhanced the prospects for real estate development in the surrounding countryside including the farms along Providence Rd. Among the more prominent residents of this area was J. S. Myers, whose farm embraced approximately 1200 acres. In 1902, his daughter, Sophie, married George Stephens. This was to be a propitious connection for Charlotte’s future.

George Stephens was a talented, sensitive and gregarious man. A native of Guilford Co., North Carolina, he entered the University of North Carolina in 1892, where he excelled as a student and as an athlete. Indeed, he was offered a contract as a professional baseball player because of his prowess as a pitcher. Stephens decided instead to move to Charlotte following his graduation in the mid 1890s. Having written his senior thesis on the subject of road paving materials, he was attracted to Mecklenburg County because of its reputation for good roads.10 In 1899, he joined with F. C. Abbott in establishing Abbott & Stephens, a real estate firm. In 1901, Stephens became vice-president of tile Piedmont Realty Co., the developers of Piedmont Park. Also in 1901, he, Abbott, B. D. Heath and Word H. Wood founded the Southern States Trust Co., later the American Trust Co., of which Stephens became president following F. C. Abbott’s withdrawal from the company in 1902.11

In 1905, George Stephens brought John Nolen (1869-1937), who was to become one of America’s premier landscape architects and comprehensive planners, to Charlotte to design Independence Park, the first public park in the city. Interestingly, this was Nolen’s initial job. He was still a student in the School of Landscape Architecture at Harvard University.12 During his sojourn in Charlotte, Nolen commented that Stephen’s father-in-law, J. S. or “Jack” Myers, resided on a farm which had enormous potential as a residential development. It is reasonable to infer that this observation, coming as it did from such an impressive source, made a profound impression upon George Stephens. Jack Myers had long dreamed that his 1200-acre farm might become a fashionable residential development. However, he lacked the business skill that was necessary to achieve this objective. That was the ingredient which his talented, astute, and earnest son-in-law, George Stephens was to provide.

In 1911, George Stephens became the founder and president of the Stephens Co., a real estate firm committed to transforming the Myers Farm and certain contiguous parcels into a lavish, sophisticated suburb.14 Not surprising, Stephens selected John Nolen as the landscape architect who would design Myers Park. On November 6, 1911, the Charlotte Evening Chronicle reported that Nolen had had “the tract in hand for some time.” According to the Chronicle of December 30, 1911, the scope of Myers Park was “one of the biggest ever undertaken in this section of the South.”16 “In residential developments of this character we get a good idea of what can be done by municipalities in beautifying the cities of the country,” John Nolen asserted.17 On March 13, 1912, the Charlotte Observer exclaimed that Myers Park could be “a suburb of surpassing elegance and attractiveness.”18 This expectation would be fulfilled.

Among the essential amenities of Myers Park was a streetcar line. Grading for the line was well under way by February 1912, and trolleys began serving the suburbs on September 1, 1912.19 The Myers Park line branched off from the Elizabeth College line at the intersection of Elizabeth Ave. and Hawthorne Ln. and extended southward into the suburb, entering Myers Park at the intersection of E. Fourth St. and Queens Rd.20 On August 29, 1912, the Charlotte Observer announced that the Stephens Co. would erect a “combination gate and waiting station on any car line in the South,” the Charlotte Observer asserted.22 The contractor, J. A. Gardner, brought granite from Winnsboro, SC for the job. The waiting station and gate were completed by late September or early October 1912.23 The waiting station at the intersection of Queens Rd. and Hermitage Rd. was erected soon thereafter. 24 One cannot definitively attribute these structures to John Nolen. However, logic suggests that he would have designed landscape features of this order of magnitude. In the opinion of the Charlotte Observer, the entrance gate was waiting stations typified the elegance of Myers Park. “The expenditure of money which the Stephens Company is putting into the feature, largely ornamental, is an illustration of the care which is being taken to secure artistic finish in every detail,” the newspaper stated.25

Myers Park prospered. John Nolen sent landscape architects to Charlotte to prepare site plans for the purchasers of lots in the suburb. The Stephens Co. provided this service, thereby underscoring its commitment to excellence in fashioning its streetcar suburb. In 1915, Earl S. Draper, an associate of Nolen’s, located in Charlotte and oversaw the planting of trees along the streets of Myers Park. George Stephens resigned as president of the Stephens Co. in July 1922 and moved to Asheville, NC.25 Streetcar service in Charlotte terminated on March 12, 1938.27 Sometime thereafter, the entrance gate to Myers Park was demolished.28 However, the waiting stations at the entrance and the one at Hermitage Rd. and Queens Rd. survive.29

 


Footnotes:

1 The Charlotte Home Democrat (January 7, 1887), p. 3.

2 The Charlotte News (February 12, 1891), p. 1.

3 The Charlotte News (March 17, 1891), p. 3. The Charlotte News (May 19, 1891), p. 1.

4 The Charlotte News (May 21, 1891), p. 1. The Morning Star (Wilmington, NC) (May 22, 1891), p. 1.

5 The Charlotte Observer (September 20, 1900), p. 5.

6 The Charlotte Observer (May I5, 1901), p. 5.

7 The Charlotte Observer (March 21, 1902), p. 5.

8 The Charlotte Observer (December 13, 1902), p. 6.

9 “Charlotte – Real Estate and Subdivisions. Myers Park” a folder in the vertical files of the Carolina Room of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Library. Hereafter cited as Myers Park. “Stephens, George (Mr. and Mrs.)” a folder in the vertical files of the Carolina Room of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Library. Hereafter cited as Stephens.

10 Stephens.

11 F. C. Abbott, Fifty Years in Charlotte Real Estate (Charlotte, N.C., n.d.). A monograph in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Library. For additional information on Word H. Wood, see Dr. Dan L. Morrill, “Survey and Research Report on the Wood-Platt House” (prepared on October 30, 1978, for the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Properties Commission).

12 Myers Park. Robert Livingston Schlyler, ed., Edward T. James, assoc. ed., Dictionary of American Biography (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1958), Vol. 22 (Supplement Two), pp. 490-491.

13 Myers Park. Stephens.

14 For the major acquisitions of the Stephens Co., see Mecklenburg County Deed Books 268, p. 353; 277, p. 189; 268, p. 597; 280, p. 41; 280, p. 201; 277, p. 638; 276, p. 496; 283, p. 222; 276, p. 508; 283, p. 337; 280, p. 491. For maps or the locations of the waiting stations, see Mecklenburg County Map Book 230 p. 122 & 124.

15 Charlotte Evening Chronicle (November 6, 1911), p. 6

16 Charlotte Evening Chronicle (December 30, 1911), p. 1.

17 The Charlotte Observer (March 21, 1912), p. 7.

18 The Charlotte Observer (March 13, 1912), p. 6.

19 The Charlotte Observer (February 8, 1912), p. 6. (September 2, 1912), p. 5.

20 Charlotte Evening Chronicle (November 6, 1911), p. 6. Initially known as the Boulevard, Queens Road acquired its name in February 1913 in honor of Queens College, which would be locate at the southern terminus of the thoroughfare (Charlotte Observer [February 1, 1913], p. 7). John Nolen also designed the Queens College Campus (Charlotte Observer [March 22, 1912], p. 6).

21 The Charlotte Observer (August 29, 1912), p. 6.

22 The Charlotte Observer (September 2, 1912), p. 5.

23 The Charlotte Observer (August 29, 1912), p. 6.

24 The Charlotte Observer (October 10, 1912), p. 5. Technically, Hermitage Court was not part of Myers Park. It was developed by the Simmons Co., not the Stephens Co.

25 The Charlotte Observer (August 29, 1912), p. 6.

26 Myers Park. Stephens.

27 The Charlotte Observer (March 13, 1938), p. 1.

28 For a photograph of the entrance gate, see William T. Simmons and L. Brooks Lindsay, Charlotte and Mecklenburg County: A Pictorial History, (Donning Co., Norfolk, VA., n.d.), p. 59. It should be noted that this volume contains many errors.

29 Local residents recall that there were other waiting stations on the Myers Park line. None, however, survive.

 

7. A brief architectural description of the property: This report contains an architectural description of the property prepared by Jack O. Boyte, A.I.A.

 

8. Documentation of why and in what ways the property meets the criteria set forth in N.C.G.S.160A-399.4:

 

a. Special significance in terms of its history, architecture, and/or cultural importance: The Commission judges that the property known as the Myers Park Streetcar Waiting Stations does possess special significance in terms of Charlotte-Mecklenburg. The Commission bases its judgment on the following considerations: 1) they conform to the plan devised by John Nolen, a landscape architect of national renown; 2) they have strong associative ties with George Stephens, an individual of local and regional importance; 3) they are the only surviving elements of the Myers Park streetcar line and, except for a substantially altered streetcar barn in Dilworth, of the entire Charlotte streetcar system, which served this community from May 1891 until March 1938.

b. Integrity of design, setting, workmanship, materials, feeling, and/or association: The Commission judges that the architectural description included herein demonstrates that the property known as the Myers Park Streetcar Waiting Stations meets this criterion.

9. Ad Valorem Tax Appraisal: The Commission is aware that designation would allow the owner to apply annually for an automatic deferral of 50% of the Ad Valorem taxes on all or any portion of the property which becomes “historic property.” The subject property is owned by the City of Charlotte and is, therefore, not subject to Ad Valorem taxes.

 

 


Bibliography

F. C. Abbott, Fifty Years In Charlotte Real Estate (Charlotte, NC, n.d.).

Charlotte Evening Chronicle.

The Charlotte Home Democrat.

The Charlotte News

The Charlotte Observer

“Charlotte – Real Estate and Subdivisions. Myers Park. “A folder in the vertical files of the Carolina Room of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Library.

The Morning Star (Wilmington, NC).

Dr. Dan L. Morrill, “Survey and Research Report on the Wood-Platt House.” (Prepared on October 30, 1978, for the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Properties Commission.

Records of the Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds Office.

Records of the Mecklenburg County Tax Office.

Robert Livingston Schlyler, ed., Edward T. James, assoc. ed., Dictionary of American Biography (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1958), Vol. 22 (Supplement Two).

William T. Simmons and L. Brooks Lindsay Charlotte and Mecklenburg County: A Pictorial History (Donning Co., Norfolk, VA, n.d.).

“Stephens, George (Mr. and Mrs.)” a folder in the vertical files of the Carolina Room of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Library.

 

Date of preparation of this report: June 4, 1980.

Prepared by: Dr. Dan L. Morrill, Director
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Properties Commission
3500 Shamrock Dr.
Charlotte, NC 22215

 

 

Architectural Description
 

By Jack O. Boyte

On the southeastern fringe of Charlotte a new residential subdivision was spread across rolling farm land in the first decade of this century. This neighborhood called “Myers Park” was designed by landscape architect John Nolen to include convenience as well as beauty and comfort. A primary convenience, advertised by the developers, was easy access to the new electric trolley which snaked through the subdivision in a landscaped median. No house lot was to be more than two blocks from the street car. Furthermore, shelters were erected at regular intervals along the line to protect waiting commuters; a line which reached as far as the Queens College campus. Three of the original shelters remain much as they were when new in 1912. Two of these shelters identify the original subdivision gateway at the intersection of East Fourth Street and Queens Road. Here there was a large center trolley shed, since demolished, through which double tracks entered the grass median. Smaller sheds at each side of the divided street covered the paved walks. These flanking shelters anchor semi-circular low stone walls which flare out further to give a grand scale to this main Myers Park entrance. On the east side of the intersection at Queens and Hermitage Roads is the third shelter, also remarkably preserved with most original material intact.

The three shelters have uniform design and detailing. The one remaining at Hermitage Road was intended to provide a covered bench waiting area, while those at Fourth Street are larger, more impressive gateway canopies. The structures have broad over hanging wooden roofs, twelve feet wide and eight feet front to back, resting on two large granite pillars. Unusual features on the Fourth Street shelter piers are small stone lugs projecting from three sides to support wood roof overhang knee brackets. Built of rough faced random ashlar, the sturdy piers rise more than eight feet to a bracketed rectangular frame. Above this is a low tripped roof covered with sawn cedar shingles. While not original, the wood roof surfaces have weathered to a soft gray patina consistent with the shelters’ years.

The wood superstructure is framed of finished 4 x 4s and 4 x 6s. Rafter ends are exposed and chamfered to align with a narrow fascia on the roof perimeter. There is a painted ceiling of 4 inch boards, beaded at the edge and center in the typical turn of the century manner. A small crown mold trims the ceiling edges.

The granite blocks, rough cut from the popular “blue” Winnsboro stone of the time, vary in size and shape. Chiseled edges abut in generally uniform joints which are tooled with a square edged rustication line designed to emphasize random coursing. The stone cork in the shelter pillars and curved gate walls is an exceptional example of the skilled stone masonry common at the turn of the century, and the original surfaces show no apparent deterioration.

The shelters have been carefully, and fortunately, preserved since the last trolley ran nearly forty years ago. Few changes have occurred, though the piers at Fourth Street have poorly built shoulder additions which should be removed, and one ceiling has been repaired with plywood instead of beaded ceiling boards. Otherwise, these fine little structures are in good condition and are significant architectural remnants from a colorful era in Charlotte’s recent history.

 


Addendum to the Survey and Research Report on the Myers Park Streetcar Waiting Stations

The Hermitage Court Gateways

1. Brief historical sketch of the property:

On February 28, 1912, the Charlotte Observer announced that Floyd M. Simmons of the Simmons Company, a local real estate firm, had purchased a tract of land which was contiguous with Myers Park, the elegant streetcar suburb which the Stephens Company had recently begun. John Nolen (1869-1937), the landscape architect for Myers Park, also designed Simmons’ development, which was named “Hermitage Court.”1 Hermitage Court opened on October 10, 1912.2 Among the amenities of the suburb were massive entrance gates at either end of the boulevard.3 “It is believed by the developers these gateways will lend a tone and exclusiveness to the suburb which could be derived in no other way,” the Charlotte Observer reported on March 21, 1912.4 Construction of the gateways was in progress by early September 1912.5 They were finished before the official opening of Hermitage Court on October 10, 1912. The Charlotte Observer was expansive in its description of these edifices: “At either entrance to Hermitage Court is a handsome granite gateway, pointed with red cement mortar, the work on these was done by two Scotchmen who came here for the purpose from Aberdeen Scotland last June. On one gate appears the inscription, “Ye Easte Gayte,” and on the other, “Ye Weste Gayte.” Many are designed after the entrance ways to Andrew Jackson’s old home near Nashville.”6

 


NOTES

1 Charlotte Observer (February 28, 1912), p. 6.

2 Charlotte Observer (October 10, 1912), p. 5.

3 For an early photograph of the western gate, see Charlotte Observer (November 3, 1912), p. 9.

4 Charlotte Observer (March 21, 1912), p. 6.

5 Charlotte Observer (September 2, 1912), p. 5.

6 Charlotte Observer (October 10, 1912), p. 5.

Date of preparation of this Addendum: July 2, 1980

Prepared by: Dr. Dan L. Morrill, Director
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Properties Commission
3500 Shamrock Dr.
Charlotte, N.C. 28215

Telephone: (704) 332-2726

 

 

Architectural Description
 

Jack O. Boyte

A short distance beyond the imposing “Myers Park” entrance, a new subdivision was also opened in 1912 whose gateways matched the masonry design of the main “Myers Park” gate as well as the nearby trolley shelter at the intersection of Queens and Hermitage Roads. Borrowing the adjoining street name, as well as the granite “Myers Park” entrance details, Hermitage Court connected Hermitage Road to Highway 16 (Providence Road) which ran parallel to Queens Road about a half mile to the east. The new development had unique east and west gates. At each end of the long median divided street, the sidewalks and drives were flanked by massive granite piers and low curved walls which guarded and defined the new subdivision. This extraordinary stone work remains today undisturbed and still an impressive community feature.

From Hermitage Road one may walk into Hermitage Court between tall blue granite pillars at either side. Or vehicles can enter one way drives left or right which are also flanked by tall stone piers. The walkway gate piers are three feet square and rise seven feet to sloped stone peaks. In the center, a landscaped median with twin pillars and a connecting, low, undulating wall complete the impressive gateway. These center piers are four feet square and rise more than nine feet to stone caps which also slope up to low peaks. At the top are remnants of brass brackets which give evidence that at an earlier time the center piers were crowned with decorative lanterns. Small round granite wheel bumpers protrude from the base of all curb side piers.

At the east end of Hermitage Court is another gateway of massive granite pillars and low walls. This gateway faces Providence Road with the same impressive masonry details as those at the Queens-Hermitage Road end. The stone work in the twin entrances is similar to that found in the original trolley line gates and shelters. The rough face random granite ashlar is the same, and the joints show the same careful workmanship. However, pink colored mortar appears on the Hermitage Court stonework whereas, it is ordinary gray in the earlier Myers Park installations.

These remarkable old gateways represent a time when impressive entrance details were regularly used to define important boundaries. County lines, for entrance, were often graced with such structures. As rare survivors of that time and as significant elements in the early development of suburban “Myers Park,” the Hermitage Court granite gates are important architectural remnants.