INGLESIDE

This report was written on September 1, 1976

1. Name and location of the property: The property known as Ingleside is located on the Bud Henderson Rd. in the northern portion of Mecklenburg County.

2. Name, addresses, and telephone numbers of the present owners and occupants of the property:
The present owners of the property are:
Ralph B. Dean H. Skipper
RFD 3
Box 41
Huntersville, NC 28078

Telephone: 875-6173

3. Representative photographs of the property: Representative photographs of the property.

4. A map depicting the location of the property: This report contains a map which depicts the location of the property.

5. Current Deed Book Reference to the property: The most recent reference to this property is found in Mecklenburg County Deed Book 3708 at page 762. The Parcel Number of the property is 015-021-18.

6. A brief historical sketch of the property:

Local tradition holds that the house known as Ingleside, Scottish for “fireside,” was erected during the years immediately following the Civil War. It was the home of Dr. William Speight McLean Davidson (1817-1873) prominent physician and planter of northern Mecklenburg, who was a grandson of Major John Davidson, the 18th century industrialist and planter who had constructed the magnificent plantation house at Rural Hill on the Catawba River. One of ten children born to John Davidson and Sarah Harper Brevard Davidson, Dr. William S. M. Davidson received his B.A. from Davidson College in 1840 as a member of the first graduating class of that institution. Having acquired his M.D. from the Medical College of South Carolina at Charleston in 1842, he returned to Mecklenburg County and established a medical practice which extended from Long Creek to the Iredell County Line. His first wife was Jane Torrence. Dr. Davidson’s only child, James Torrance Davidson, was born to this union and died in young adulthood. Following the death of his first wife, Dr. Davidson married Rebecca Reed, a native of Alabama, whom he also outlived. His third wife was Mary Johnston. Dr. Davidson died in 1873 and was buried in the graveyard at Hopewell Presbyterian Church. He was remembered as a resourceful and energetic citizen of his community. His widow moved to Charlotte soon after her husband’s death. She died in 1896. Since then the house has passed through several hands and has recently been refurbished by Mr. Ralph E. Skipper.

7. A brief architectural description of the property: This report contains an architectural description prepared by Jack O. Boyte, A.I.A.

8. Documentation of why and in what ways the property meets the criteria set forth in N.C.G.S. 160A-399.4:

 

a. historical and cultural significance: The historical and cultural significance of the property known as Ingleside rests upon two factors. First, it has strong associative ties with a family of local and regional prominence. Second, it has architectural significance as the finest example of the Italianate Style in Mecklenburg County.

b. Suitability for preservation and restoration: Ingleside retains much of its original integrity and therefore is suitable for preservation and restoration.

c. Educational value: Ingleside has educational value as the finest example of the Italianate Style in Mecklenburg County and as a structure which has strong associative ties with a family of local and regional prominence.

d. Cost of acquisition, restoration, maintenance, or repair: The Commission has no intention of purchasing this property nor is it aware of any intention of the owner to sell. The Commission assumes that all costs associated with renovating and maintaining the property will be paid by the owner or subsequent owners of the property.

e. Possibilities for adaptive or alternative use of the property: The Commission concurs with the present owner’s intention to maintain the house as a viable residential structure. The house could be transformed into a house-museum.

f. Appraised value: The current tax appraisal value of the land and house is $26,600. The Commission is aware that designation of the property would allow the owner to apply for a special classification for purposes of Ad Valorem taxation.

g. The administrative and financial responsibility of any person or organization willing to underwrite all or a portion of such costs: As indicated earlier, the Commission has no intention of purchasing this property. Furthermore, the Commission assumes that all costs associated with the property will be paid by whatever party now owns or will subsequently own the property. Clearly, the present owner has demonstrated the capacity to pay the expenses associated with maintaining the structure.

9. Documentation of why and in what ways the property meets the criteria established for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places: The Commission judges that the property known as Ingleside does meet the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places. Basic to the Commission’s judgment is its knowledge of the fact that the National Register of Historic Places functions to identify properties of local and state historic significance. The Commission believes that the property known as Ingleside is of local historic significance and thereby meets the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places.

10. Documentation of why and in what ways the property is of historic importance to Charlotte and/or Mecklenburg County: As noted earlier, the property known as Ingleside is of local historical significance for two reasons. First, it has strong associative ties with a family of local and regional prominence. Dr. Davidson, a grandson of Major John Davidson, was among the earliest graduates of Davidson College. He was one of the earliest professionally-trained physicians in Mecklenburg County. Second, the house has architectural value as the finest example of the Italianate Style in Mecklenburg County.

 

---

Bibliography

John Brevard Alexander, Biographical Sketches of the Early Settlers of Hopewell Community.

An Inventory of Older Buildings In Mecklenburg County and Charlotte for the Historic Properties Commission.

Chalmers Gaston Davidson, Major John Davidson of Rural Hill. Mecklenburg County. NC Pioneer, Industrialist, Planter.

Chalmers Gaston Davidson, The Plantation World Around Davidson.

Records of the Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds Office.

Records of the Mecklenburg County Tax Office.

The Semi-Centennial Catalogue of Davidson College.

 

Date of Preparation of this Report: September 1, 1976

Prepared by: Dr. Dan L. Morrill, Director
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Properties Commission
139 Middleton Dr.
Charlotte, NC 28207

Telephone: 332-2726

 

 

Architectural Description

Typical of many of the old country lanes in Northern Mecklenburg County is the narrow, winding Bud Henderson Road, which turns off Gilead Road a few miles west of Interstate 77. Originally a dirt wagon path between several plantations and connecting to the Salisbury Post Road, this lane probably dates from the early 1700s.

Much of the land along the road was originally acquired by land grant to pioneer Scotch Irish settler Samuel Wilson. On the site of Wilson’s original house his descendant, Dr. William Speight McClean Davidson, started to build a magnificent new manor house in the 1850s. Today stands this remarkably preserved Tuscan Revival house called Ingleside (Scottish for ‘fireside’) said to have been finished after the Civil War.

During the second quarter of the nineteenth century the popularity of classical design exemplified by Greek Revival architecture was waning. A more flexible style from the domestic architecture of the Italian Campagna was growing in favor. Featuring a simple cubic block, this design lacked projections or recessions in the main mass. Columns, if present, were confined to porches or verandas. A massive cornice (called cornicione in Tuscany) was the crowning feature of the style. Roofs were low and exterior facades symmetrical. Wall surfaces were usually smooth and often the ground story rusticated. These influences are clearly evident at Ingleside.

With a classic center hall plan, the house is three stories high, including a full cellar recessed half below grade. Wide low roofed verandas span the full width at the front and rear. The three bay front and rear facades feature double panelled entrance doors with transom windows and narrow side lights. Windows on these walls are doubled, with two four light sash in each unit. Original wood louvered blinds showing typical pegged mortise and tenoned connections are stored on the place. Fortunately the original iron strap hinges and drive pintles remain. Each side facade consists of two bays on each of the three floors. Single four light over four light windows open to second and third floor rooms. In the cellar walls are smaller balancing four light windows.

The front veranda floor rests on four square brick columns rising some five feet above grade. Above this are round brick stuccoed columns with simple Doric capitals supporting the veranda roof. With a plain boxed cornice, the moderate veranda overhang is simply finished and has no console brackets as found in the main roof cornice. Originally the veranda columns were connected by a low rounded railing supported by small square fluted pickets. This original balustrade has been salvaged and will be restored.

In the cellar area, where there were large service rooms originally, the two massive interior chimneys provided large fireplaces. There has been extensive remodeling in this part of the house, and much of the original work is concealed. However, there is abundant evidence to indicate that servant quarters were here originally. It is also probable that in this area were storage rooms and possibly an original winter kitchen.

The cellar walls are solid brick faced on the exterior with cement stucco scored to simulate ashlar stone. Above this are walls faced with narrow square edged lap siding extending up to a wide panelled frieze above the second floor windows. With panels molded to match the second floor window placement, this frieze includes repeated scroll brackets supporting a wide molded overhang, which dominates the exterior facade. Roof surfaces are low pitched and tin covered.

Through the tall double entrance doors one enters a wide front hall area which forms an expansive foyer. This foyer is set off by a rounded arch placed in the front third of the hall. Behind this a broad stair rises some eight feet to an intermediate landing at the rear. Then in a second run the stair rises another seven feet to the second floor. Above the second floor the stair continues to rise in two runs to a low garret landing. In a graceful continuous run a simple rounded rail follows the stair through each run to the garret landing. Supporting this fine rail are two small turned balusters set in the open end of each stair treabalustersd. At the first floor a heavy, rounded, tapered newel starts the balustrade.

From the wide center hall high six panel doors open to two rooms at each side. At the right the two rooms are joined by a small pair of alcove doors where built-in cupboards with narrow shelves occur in the alcove side walls. Traditionally these cabinets were used by the original builder, Dr. William Davidson, to store his medicines. The two large rooms on this side were likely waiting and treatment rooms for visiting patients.

Between these rooms there is a massive interior chimney from which large fireplaces open to the front and rear rooms on both floors. The woodwork in these rooms, and throughout the first floor, is relatively simple. On all walls a wide two piece wood base is applied to plaster surfaces. Above this a small molded chair rail occurs on all walls. At the ceiling in each room is an elaborate cornice molding. Floors are wide pine planks. The fireplace mantels in each of the four large first floor rooms are simple heavy wood members showing no classical ornamentation, and with no overmantel.

On the second floor one finds a broad simply furnished center hall with two large bed chambers at each side. Centered in the interior partition between these rooms are mantels much like those on the first floor. Floors are, again, wide pine boards.

From the double run garret stair one enters a loft area with low head room which was floored for storage only. In the garret are heavy rafters, some of which show typical vertical marks of water-sawn lumber. There are a number of hand hewn members also visible. Wooden pegs as well as early manufactured spikes were used for joining these framing members.

Ingleside is a unique house in Mecklenburg County. Built at a time when the economy was poor, the house is one of few structures remaining from the middle of the nineteenth century, and probably the only Italianate building remaining from that period.

INDEPENDENCE PARK

This report was written on September 6, 1980.

1. Name and location of the property: The property known as Independence Park is situated between the Elizabeth and Piedmont Park neighborhoods in Charlotte, NC. Specifically, portions of the original park, including the Sunnyside Rose Garden, are located on five tracts. They are: 1). 9.55 acres between N. Kings Dr. and East Independence Blvd., 2). 16.9 acres between East Independence Blvd. and N. Hawthorne Lane, 3). 6.67 acres between N. Hawthorne Lane and Park Dr. 4). .441 acres at the intersection of Insurance Ln. and E. Seventh St., and 5) .215 acres at the intersection of Rose Garden Terrace and Sunnyside Ave.

 

CLICK HERE TO SEE A VIDEO ON THIS PROPERTY

2. Name, address, telephone number of the present owner of the property:
The present owner of the property is:
The City of Charlotte
600 E. Trade St.
Charlotte, N.C. 28202

Telephone: (704) 374-2241

3. Representative photographs of the property: This report contains representative photographs of the property.

4. A map depicting the locations of the property: This report contains maps which depict the locations of the property.

 

Click on the map to browse5. Current Deed Book Reference: The subject property has several deeds, the listing of which is superfluous for purposes of this report. The current Tax Parcel Numbers of the property are: 080-171-01, 080-192-01, 080-218-01, 080-219-01 and 127-034-16.

6. A brief historical sketch of the property:

Daniel Augustus Tompkins (1851-1914), noted industrialist, founder of the Charlotte Observer and spokesmen for the principles and policies of the New South movement, was responsible for the establishment of Independence Park, the first public park in Charlotte.¹ As early as 1894, when Edward Dilworth Latta (1851-1925), president of the Charlotte Consolidated Construction Company, had offered Latta Park in Dilworth for sale to the City, the Charlotte Observer, Tompkins’s newspaper, had supported the establishment of a municipal park system.² In August 1901, the newspaper renewed its commitment, declaring that “all cities of consequence own their parks.”³ On March 7, 1904, Tompkins appeared before the Board of Aldermen in his capacity as president of the Southern Manufacturer’s Club, an organization that represented the leading entrepreneurs in the city. In keeping with his reputation as an effective and resourceful advocate, Tompkins amassed an impressive aggregate of materials and arguments in favor of his contention that Charlotte needed a public park. No doubt aware that the Board practiced frugality in all financial matters, Tompkins suggested that the park be placed at the former site of the municipal waterworks, thereby eliminating the need for the City to purchase land. He pointed out that the property would be served by two trolley lines, the Piedmont Park line and the Elizabeth College line and, therefore, would be readily accessible to the rank-and-file citizens of Charlotte. The most compelling argument which Tompkins advanced, however, was that public parks were a prudent and wise investment because they improved the moral and economic climates in cities. In support of this claim, Tompkins quoted from letters that elected officials in several communities had written to him such as Savannah, GA, Richmond, VA., Charleston, SC, Mobile, AL, Chattanooga, TN, and Toledo, OH.

 

D. A. Tompkins At its meeting on March 7, 1904, the Board of Aldermen responded affirmatively to Tompkins’s proposal and appointed Tompkins to head a special committee to oversee the project.⁵ He toured the site on April 23, 1904, with engineers from the City and discussed preliminary plans for the park.⁶ During the summer of 1904, Tompkins also negotiated with the owners of nearby property to secure the donation of additional land. He was successful. On August 1, 1904, Tompkins presented the deeds for approximately 47.5 acres of land to the Board of Aldermen, including 12.85 acres from the Highland Park Realty Co., developers of Elizabeth, and 5.57 acres from the Piedmont Realty Co., developers of Piedmont Park. The acceptance of this property by the City assured that the park would become a reality.⁷ The Charlotte Observer greeted this news joyously. “It will unquestionably prove a blessing to the community, and public spirited men are unsparing in the gratification of its assured certainty,” the newspaper proclaimed.⁸ D. A Tompkins explained at length the benefits which he believed the park would provide for Charlotte and especially for the industrial laborers who resided there. “We are increasing our industrial population, and many of our laboring men do not have an opportunity to get out into the country but once a week, on Sundays,” he explained. “It is a good thing for them to have a park such as this will be.”⁹

Interestingly, especially in relation to subsequent developments, Tompkins advocated that the park remain as much as possible in its natural state. “Put a few walks and drives through it, set out a few trees where the work of nature has been destroyed, but for the rest, ‘let it be,'” he advised.¹⁰ Unfortunately, Independence Park has not been as fortunate in retaining its natural setting as Tompkins had desired. On October 21, 1904, the Charlotte Observer reported that the City had selected the name Independence Park.¹¹ The Board of Aldermen created a Park and Tree Commission on November 7, 1904, to supervise the construction of the facility. Not surprisingly, Tompkins became chairman.¹² The Commission moved ahead with dispatch. By June 1905, it had established contact with several landscape architects for purposes of soliciting proposals.¹³ The winner of this competition was John Nolen (1869-1937), a student in the School of Landscape Architecture at Harvard University. The design of Independence Park was the initial commission in what would become an illustrious career. Nolen was one of the premier landscape architects and comprehensive planners in the United States.¹⁴ It is noteworthy that Tompkins and his associates would demonstrate such care in selecting the designer for Independence Park. This scrutiny was a manifestation of their commitment to making Charlotte a grand and majestic city. In the opinion of the Charlotte News, it was the duty of the Park and Tree Commission “to make Charlotte famous for the beauty of its parks.”¹⁵

John Nolen came to Charlotte in 1905 to supervise the implementation of his plan. During his sojourn in this community, Nolen explained the theories and concepts which undergirded modern landscape architecture. “It is a pleasure to talk with Mr. Nolen,” the Charlotte Observer asserted. “He lives close to nature. His ideas and ideals are fresh and clean.” ¹⁶ On April 7, 1906, the Charlotte Observer reported that a “handsome driveway” at the upper and at the lower end of Independence Park had been completed. ¹⁷ The completion of these improvements, however, did not terminate Nolen’s association with the Park and Tree Commission. He returned to Charlotte on several occasions to advise the Commission and to give public lectures. Among the individuals whom he met in this community was George Stephens, a real estate developer and member of the Commission. In 1911, Stephens hired Nolen to design Myers Park, the prestigious streetcar suburb to the east of Charlotte.¹⁸

Independence Park has experienced enormous change since its creation in 1905-06. As early as 1910, the residents of the surrounding neighborhood were clamoring for the expenditure of more public money on maintenance.¹⁹ Rebuffed by the Board of Aldermen, the members of the Commission borrowed funds on their own signatures. In 1914, an experimental playground for children was constructed in the park.²⁰ The City built an Armory-Auditorium in 1929 at the western end of the park.  American Legion Memorial Stadium was completed in 1936. Park Center was erected in the 1950’s to replace the Armory-Auditorium, which burned in 1954. In 1957, the City withdrew its plans to locate the Health Department in Independence Park because of the public outcry which this proposal produced in the community.

The Park and Recreation Commission, established in 1927 to replace the Park and Tree Commission, did erect an Arts and Crafts Building at the upper end of the park in 1965, however.  Happily, it has been demolished.^2l Two of the most imposing amenities in Independence Park were the Arhelger Memorial and the Sunnyside Rose Garden. Lillian Arhelger, a twenty-one year old physical education teacher, fell to her death on June 21, 1931, in an attempt to save a young child from falling over the Glen Burnie Falls.²² In appreciation of this heroic and selfless act, the people of Charlotte raised the funds to erect a memorial. It was designed by Helen Hodge, an associate of Earl S. Draper. The memorial was completed in 1931. Happily, the Arhelger Memorial is essentially unchanged from the original.²³ The Sunnyside Rose Garden has not fared as well. The Charlotte Garden Club created the rose garden in 1931. Long recognized as one of the beauty spots in the city, it was destroyed by the construction of Independence Blvd. and the Brookshire Freeway, the former in 1949-50 and the latter in 1960. A reporter for the Charlotte Observer wrote a poignant piece shortly before the demise of the rose garden. “The delicate beauty of the roses will be replaced by ribbons of concrete, he lamented. “the fragrance of the flowers will be wafted out of memory by the stench of gasoline. The quiet of the garden will give way to the roar of the motors.”²⁴ One wonders what men of the stature of D. A. Tompkins or John Nolen would say if they visited the site today.

The Thies Family at the memorial and celebration for Lillian Arhelger at Independence Park.

Frank Thies Sr., Lillian Arhelger’s brother in law.

---

NOTES:

¹ For a review of the career of Daniel Augustus Tompkins, see Howard Bunyan Clay, “Daniel Augustus Tompkins: An American Bourbon.” (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1950). An unpublished doctoral dissertation.

² The Charlotte Observer (April 3, 1894), p. 4. The Charlotte Observer (July 17, 1894), p. 1.

³ The Charlotte Observer (August 18, 1901), p. 4.

⁴ Charlotte Board of Aldermen Minute Book 9, p. 232. The Charlotte News (March 8, 1904), p. 3. The Charlotte Observer (March 6, 1904), The Charlotte Observer (March 8, 1904), p. 5.

⁵ Charlotte Board of Aldermen Minute Book 9, p. 232.

⁶ The Charlotte Observer (April 24, 1904), p. 5.

⁷ The Charlotte Observer (August 2, 1904), p. 5. Charlotte Board of Aldermen Minute Book 9, p. 244.

⁸ The Charlotte Observer (August 5, 1904), p. 6.

⁹ The Charlotte Observer (August 2, 1904), p. 5.

¹⁰ The Charlotte News (August 2, 1904), p. 3.

¹¹ The Charlotte Observer (October 21, 1904), p. 5.

¹² Charlotte Board of Aldermen Minute Book 9, p. 248. The Charlotte News (November 8, 1904), p. 4. The Charlotte Observer (November 8, 1904), p. 6.

¹³ The Charlotte News (June 6, 1905), p. 6. The Charlotte Observer (June 6, 1905), p. 5.

¹⁴ Robert Livingston Schlyler, ea., Edward T. James, assoc. ed., Dictionary of American Biography (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1958), Vol. 22 (Supplement Two), pp. 490-491.

¹⁵ The Charlotte News (November 8, 1904), p. 4.

¹⁶ The Charlotte Observer (May 8, 1906), p. 6.

¹⁷ The Charlotte Observer (April 7, 1906), p. 5.

¹⁸ Charlotte Evening Chronicle (November 6, 1911), p. 6.

¹⁹ Charlotte Evening Chronicle (April 16, 1910), p. 7. The Charlotte Observer (October 11, 1910), p. 7.

²⁰ The Charlotte Observer (December 6, 1910), p. 5. The Charlotte Observer (June 18, 1915), p. 3.

²¹ Records of the Mecklenburg County Tax Office. “Charlotte. Public Buildings.” A folder in the vertical files of the Carolina Room of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Library.

²² The Charlotte News (June 22, 1931), p. 1.

²³ The Charlotte News (June 23, 1931), p. 1. The Charlotte News (July 10, 1931) p. 1 & 9. Earl S. Draper, an associate of John Nolen’s, located in Charlotte and oversaw the planting of trees along the streets of Myers Park.

²⁴ “Charlotte Streets. To 1966.” A folder in the vertical files of the Carolina Room of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Library. “Charlotte. Gardens-Gardening.” A folder in the vertical files of the Carolina Room of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Library.

7. A brief architectural description of the property: This report contains an architectural description by Jack O. Boyte, A.I.A.

8. Documentation of why and in what ways the property meets the criteria set forth in N. C. G. S. 160A-399.4:

 

a. Special significance in terms of its history. architecture, and/or cultural importance: The Commission judges that the property known as Independence Park does possess special significance in terms of Charlotte-Mecklenburg. The Commission bases its judgment on the following considerations: 1) Independence Park is the oldest public park in Charlotte; 2) D. A. Tompkins, a New South leader of regional importance, was responsible for the creation of Independence Park; 3) Independence Park was the initial design executed by John Nolen, a landscape architect and comprehensive planner of national renown.

b. Integrity of design, setting, workmanship, materials, feeling and/or association: Obviously, much of Independence Park has been destroyed or seriously comprised. However, the Commission judges that that portion of the park from the grove of trees at the Arhelger Memorial eastward does retain its essential integrity.

9. Ad Valorem Tax Appraisal: The Commission is aware that designation would allow the owner to apply annually for an automatic deferral of 50% of the Ad Valorem taxes on all or any portion of the property which becomes historic property. The subject property is owned by the City of Charlotte and is, therefore, not subject to Ad Valorem taxes.

 

---

Bibliography

“Charlotte. Gardens-Gardening.” A folder in the vertical files of the Carolina Room of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public library.

Charlotte Board of Aldermen Minute Book 9.

Charlotte Evening Chronicle.

The Charlotte News.

The Charlotte Observer.

“Charlotte. Public Buildings.” A folder in the vertical files of the Carolina Room of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Library.

“Charlotte Streets. To 1966.” A folder in the vertical files of the Carolina Room of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Library.

Edward Bunyan Clay, “Daniel Augustus Tompkins: An American Bourbon.” (Chapel Hill, NC, 1950). An unpublished doctoral dissertation.

Records of the Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds Office.

Records of the Mecklenburg County Tax Office.

Robert Livingston Schlyler, ea., Edward T. Jumps, assoc. ea., Dictionary of American Biography (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1958), Vol. 22 (Supplement Two).

Date of Preparation of this Report: September 6, 1980.

Prepared by: Dr. Dan L. Morrill, Director
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Properties Commission
3500 Shamrock Dr.
Charlotte, NC 28215

Telephone: (704) 332-2726

 

Architectural DescriptionThe earliest recreation area owned by the City of Charlotte was Independence Park, located just east of Sugar Creek between Elizabeth Avenue and Monroe Road. Fortunately, the city authorities decided to seek professional help in planning the park. They retained a talented, young landscape architect, John Nolen, who was later to achieve renown for his work on Myers Park. Nolen’s 1905 design was obviously intended to preserve and enhance the existing features of the lake valley. The quiet informality of his plan retained the rural setting and established a lasting natural landscape. At the eastern end of the park land, where it straddles the earth bridge of Hawthorne Lane, the half mile long, tree shaded valley remains much as it has been for three quarters of a century. Nolen made generous use of planting, and many of the trees he started have matured into magnificent old oaks, poplars and maples interspersed later with flowering shrubs. Footpaths wander through the park, and occasional old granite benches in small, grassy nooks offer havens from the bustle of nearby city streets. In its early years, the lake, and later the park, was bordered by a shoreline road.

This road, now called Park Drive, was paved in the 1920’s when many of the dirt streets in Elizabeth were improved. Vertical slabs of Mecklenburg granite bordered most early paved streets. This stone curbing has been replaced with concrete in most city streets; however, portions of Park Drive still retain the picturesque old granite curbing. At the eastern-end, the park is circled by cottages built during the early years of this century. The architectural style is typical of the times and adds much to the charm of the park setting. For its first twenty five years, Independence Park was a rural sanctuary — a place to rest beside a spring fed brook. As the neighborhood grew, however, playground facilities were added. A grammar school was placed on the side near Elizabeth Avenue. Tennis courts were built on the opposite hillside, and a portion of the valley was filled to create baseball and football fields.

At the lower end, near Sugar Creek, the valley was molded into a vast open air amphitheater. In the year 1931, the busy playground which filled the park beside the school became the setting for a beautiful memorial garden. Built to honor a school teacher who died tragically in a vain attempt to save a falling child in the North Carolina mountains, the Lillian Arhelger Memorial blends into the eastern end of the playground basin beside the sloping side of Hawthorne Lane. Here landscape designer Helen Hodge was commissioned by the Charlotte High School students to create an enduring memorial to honor their friend and teacher. The rustic stone and timber garden setting, with its flowing water, offers a rare and inviting resting place for many visitors, young and old. The garden features a stone lined reflecting pool, used regularly for wading, mostly by children. Rustling water tumbles down a nearby stone wall and fills the pond. A bronze plaque on the wall describes the courageous act commemorated by the garden. Stone walks sweep in a wide oval at the water’s edge, and beyond this are terraced benches, also of stone, which form a natural border. At the far end is a cedar roofed shelter for picnicking, and at one side a shallow stone sand pit.

The Independence Building

Click here to view photo gallery on the Independence Building

Click here to read an article on the demolition of the Independence Building

This report was written Dec 7, 1977

1. Name and location of the property: property known as the Independence Building (Realty Building) is located at 100-102 W. Trade St. in Charlotte, N.C.

2. Name, address and telephone number of the present owner and occupant of the property:

The owner of the property is:

Rushing Construction Co.
RFD 1
Box 265
Indian Trail, N.C.
Telephone: 821-7605

 

The present occupants of the property are:

Coral Gift Shop
107 N. Tryon St.
Charlotte, N.C.
Telephone: 374-1871
K-Wig Shop
105 N. Tryon St.
Charlotte, N,C.
Telephone: 333-9161
Fields Jewelers, Inc.
101 N. Tryon St.
Charlotte, N,C.
Telephone: 333-0138
National Shirt Shops
101-A N. Tryon St.
Charlotte, N.C.
Telephone: 374-9000
3. Representative Photographs of the property. This report contains representative photographs of the property.

4. A map depicting the location of the property. This report contains a map depicting the location of the property.

5. Current Deed Book Reference to the Property. The most recent reference to this property is found in Mecklenburg County Deed Book 3684 at Page 386. The Parcel Number of the property is 078-014-07. This report contains a complete chain of title for the Independence Building (Realty Building).
6.A brief historical sketch of the property:

The series of developments which led to the construction of the Independence Building (Realty Building) at Trade and Tryon Sts. in Charlotte, N.C., began on July 26, 1905. On that day a group of prominent businessmen (W. H. Belk, C. N. Evans, O. P. Heath, Julian H. Little and C. M. Patterson) secured charters of incorporation for two new concerns, the Charlotte Trust Co. and the Charlotte Realty Co. Both enterprises opened for business on September 23, 1905, in their headquarters in the basement of the Central Hotel on the southeastern corner of the Square. The organizations prospered under the leadership of Julian H. Little, who had been elected President of the two firms on September 2, 1905. Illustrative of this success was the decision to seek more prestigious facilities for the new bank and its real estate affiliate.

In 1906 the group selected Daniel Augustus Tompkins, publisher of The Charlotte Observer and renowned advocate of Southern industrialization, to approach the owners of the “Osborne Corner,” the lot on the northwestern corner of the Square. Mr. Little and his associates believed that this would be the most suitable location for the imposing building which they envisaged. On November 27, 1906, the Charlotte Realty Co. purchased the land and the structure situated thereon for the then astounding sum of ninety-two thousand dollars. Adding to the excitement engendered by this transaction was the announcement that the buyers intended to erect “a ten or a twelve-story, steel frame, office building on the site, a regular sky scraper (sic.).”

Mr. Little and his associates held a major design competition for the proposed skyscraper. The Charlotte Observer of April 24, 1907, stated that the Board of Directors of the Charlotte Realty Co. were reviewing the plans which had been submitted by the eight architectural firms that were participants in the final stages of this process. Representatives from as far away as Boston, Mass., New York City, Washington, D.C., and Birmingham, Ala., appeared before the Board. Also among the finalists were three local firms: Hook & Rogers, Franklin Gordon, and Wheeler, Runge & Dickey.

On May 27, 1907, the Board of Directors of the Charlotte Realty Co. selected Frank Pierce Milburn as the architect for the “new 12-story fireproof office building of the skyscraper type” which would be erected on the northwestern corner of Independence Square. The selection of Mr. Milburn was an indication of the seriousness and professionalism with which Mr. Little and his associates had superintended the design competition. A native of Bowling Green, Ky., and graduate of Arkansas Industrial University, Hr. Milburn was one of the most prominent architects who designed structures in the two Carolinas from the 1890’s until his death in September 1926. An article in the Summer 1973 issue of the North Carolina Historical Review lists most of the structures in North Carolina for which Mr. Milburn was the architect. Included among them are several of the imposing buildings which were erected in Charlotte in the two decades preceding the outbreak of the First World War. The Stonewall Hotel on W. Trade St., the Charlotte Sanatorium at Church and Seventh Sts., the Mecklenburg County Courthouse on S. Tryon St. and the Independence Building (Realty Building) were some of the noteworthy contributions which Mr. Milburn made to the emerging townscape of this community. The Charlotte Observer of May 18, 1908, provided additional evidence of the scope of Mr. Milburn’s practice. It reported that Mr. Milburn had designed twenty-seven edifices which were then under construction in North Carolina, including courthouses, county jails, railroad stations, college buildings, hospitals, hotels and office building. Perhaps Mr. Milburn is best remembered for the buildings which he designed on the campus of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, such as the YMCA Building and the Bynum Gymnasium.

The contract for erecting the Independence Building (Realty Building) was awarded to the J. A. Jones Construction Company. James Addison Jones, a native of Randolph County, had come to Charlotte in the 1880’s to work as a common laborer for a Mr. Cecil, a contractor from Lexington, N.C., who built several of Charlotte’s textile mills of the post-bellum era. Sometime in the early 1890’s Mr. Jones had established his own firm, thereby launching the development of a construction enterprise that would erect high-rise buildings throughout this country and abroad. It is worth noting, however, that the Independence Building (Realty Building) was the first skyscraper built by the now-famous J. A. Jones Construction Company.

The transformation of the “Osborne Corner” began in January 1908 with the destruction of the frame structure (the John Irwin House) which had stood on the site since the early 1800’s and which in more recent years had housed the Woodall & Sheppard Drug Co. That the citizens of Charlotte wore intensely interested in the project is certain. The Charlotte Observer of June 8, 1908, commented that “pedestrians on the street are beginning to develop into a set of ‘rubber necks’ in their attempt to see, every morning, whether or not it (the skyscraper) has climbed during the night and, every night, how high it has leaped since morning. It is not difficult to understand why the construction of the Independence Building (Realty Building) attracted so much attention. Irrefutable documentation exists to prove that this was the first steel-frame high-rise building erected in North Carolina. A reporter for The News and Observer of Raleigh, N.C., stated on June 21, 1908, that the Only skyscraper in the State” was “being constructed” in Charlotte. In an interview which was published in The Charlotte Observeron May 18, 1908, Frank P. Milburn boasted that a “new 12-story and basement steel-frame skyscraper” was underway in Charlotte, which would be “the first building of this type and the most expensive office building in the State.” Lawrence Wodehouse, author of the article on Mr. Milburn which appears in the Summer 1973 issue of The North Carolina Historical Review, declares that Frank Milburn “was the architect for the first steel frame building erected in North Carolina,” the Independence Building (Realty Building) “in Charlotte.”

The people of Charlotte took great pride in the fact that they would soon have the tallest edifice in the state. To them it symbolized the strength and vitality of the commercial and industrial base of this community. The Charlotte Observer of 1908-09 spoke to this point on several occasions. Particularly illuminating in this regard were the comments of two reporters who visited the top of the still-unfinished skyscraper in October 1908. “Appreciation of what the city is,” they asserted, “comes only to those who view it from this aerial spot.” Only from the top of “the most magnificent building of the Carolinas” could one appreciate that “Charlotte assumes the nature of a mining-town in western Pennsylvania, everlastingly enwrapped in clouds of smoke.” So proud were the local residents of the emerging skyscraper that they persuaded J. A. Jones to “shove the towering structure 30 feet further up” by putting the first column of the final portion of the steel frame into place, thereby letting the delegates to the Democratic State Convention in June 1908 see the extra height of the building.

Tenants began to occupy the upper floors of the building in late 1908. It was not until May 18, 1909, however, that the banking facility opened on the first floor, just two days before President William Howard Taft was scheduled to visit the city. In January 1908 the Charlotte Trust Co. had merged with the Charlotte National Bank, the consolidated organization having retained the name of the latter institution. The President of the enlarged Charlotte National Bank was B. D. Heath. Julian H. Little and John M. Scott were Vice-Presidents. The bank occupied the southern half of the first floor and the main entrance thereto was located on the Trade St. side of the building. A hallway extended from the entrance on Tryon St. to a bank of three elevators which provided access to the upper floors. Woodall & Sheppard Drug Co. occupied the northern half of the first floor. The Charlotte Observer described the facilities of the Charlotte National Bank in detail.

 

Ideally beautiful and convenient in all of its appointments and ranking far above any other in N.C. and equal with any in the Southern States, the now home of the Charlotte National Bank on the first floor of the Realty Building is ready for the removal of the offices of this prosperous banking institution. Artistic, indeed, is the touch of finish which has been given the new offices. The work of ornamentation has been in the hands of capable experts and a first glance will reveal the fine and tasty conception of the artists who have been supervising the interior structure. . . . The scheme of the fixtures proper is solid marble of the most beautiful and costly kind. It is known as the skirus material which is more ornate and pleasing to the eye than the pure white strain. With bronze railings and no wood-work at all in connection with the main offices of the bank, the effect is entirely artistic. . . . The ceiling is of old ivory and this, together with the mahogany finish in the private offices and desks, gives a most artistic color scheme for the entire interior. On either side of the Trade St. entrance is an office for Cashier W. H. Twitty and active Vice President J. H. Little. The private office of the president is not so prominent, being located in the corner of the building. The desks in the offices of both the cashier and vice-president are of even height with the marble ledge, thus enabling them to look over their desks and observe everything that goes on in the building, even to the notice of every person who enters the bank. The offices of these gentlemen are of mahogany finish of the finest kind and make a lovely appearance.

 

The Charlotte Evening Chronicle of May 18, 1909, provided the following description of the new facilities of the Charlotte National Bank.

 

The Charlotte National will occupy all of the first floor of the Realty Building as far back as the elevators, this being fully half the first floor. The wood finish, the marble and decorative work, the tiled floors and the convenient arrangement of the offices of the bank officials, the clerks and others, and the convenience of the bank to the public generally, all combining to render the institution the most modern banking place in the Carolinas and probably in the South. President B. D. Heath and Cashier W. H. Twitty have convenient offices in the front of the bank, facing on W. Trade Street. The main entrance is on W. Trade St., midway of the building. The paying tellers’ window, auditors window, etc., are arranged in a line extending nearly across the building and about 15 feet back from the main entrance and facing it. The bookkeeping department and all other departments of the bank are located behind this partition in which the windows are located, while the vault is located to the right as one enters and to the side of the space behind the various windows, tellers, etc.

 

Perhaps the most intriguing feature of the bank and one which reflected the cultural values of the era in which it opened was “the department sot apart for the ladies.” The Charlotte Observer explained that the officials of Charlotte National had “set aside an office in a more concealed corner of the bank for the use of the lady customers, thus enabling them to enter from the Tryon St. door and transact their business without shoving into the general crowd.”

Change and transformation have dominated the Independence Building (Realty Building) during its almost seventy-year history. Until his death on September 12, 1955, Julian H. Little was the principal figure associated with its evolution. A native of Richmond County, North Carolina, Mr. Little came to Charlotte soon after graduating from the University of North Carolina in 1888. His early years in this community were spent as an employee of the Heath Cotton Company, where he became personally acquainted with Mr. B. D. Heath. By 1908 Mr. Little had established a reputation as a prudent and capable banker, having established the Charlotte Trust Co. in 1905 and becoming a vice-president of the Charlotte National Bank at the time of its merger with the Charlotte Trust Co. By 1911 Julian H. Little had succeeded B. D. Heath as President of the Charlotte National Bank. Moreover, he had been the chief executive officer of the Charlotte Realty Co. (re-named the Charlotte Realty and Trust Co. in January 1908) since its inception in 1905.

The first major change in the physical appearance of the Independence Building (Realty Building) occurred in 1912. On January 9, 1912, Mr. Little resigned as President of the Charlotte National Bank. There is reason to believe that this action was caused by a disagreement between Mr. Little and Mr. John M. Scott, who succeeded J. H. Little as President of Charlotte National. The Charlotte Observer of January 10, 1912, reported that Mr. Little would “shortly undertake plans looking to the organization of another national bank. Mr. Little was characterized as one of the most capable and diligent bankers in the city and the local newspaper predicted that it was a “foregone conclusion” that any bank which he directed would be “highly successful”. Mr. Little did not disappoint his advocates. On May 4, 1912, the Independence Trust Co. headed by Julian H. Little opened for business. The initial headquarters of this financial institution were located in the basement of the Independence Building (Realty Building). It is important to remember that the Charlotte Realty and Trust Co. held title to the structure. Obviously, Mr. Little took advantage of this situation by placing his bank directly beneath Charlotte National. As if to add insult to injury, the Independence Trust Co. announced that it would begin operations “in the basement of its own banking house. Mr.Little also began to refer to the edifice as the Independence Building. Heretofore it had only been known as the skyscraper or the Realty Building. By 1914 the Independence Trust Co. had moved upstairs, occupying the northern half of the first floor where Woodall & Sheppard Drug Co. had been located. Until 1919 or 1920 the Charlotte National Bank remained on the first floor of the Independence Building (Realty Building). When the Charlotte National Bank moved into its new headquarters at 4th and S. Tryon Sts., the Independence Trust Co. occupied the former facilities of its rival, having placed its Insurance Department in the northern half of the first floor. From 1912 to 1928 the main entrance of the Independence Trust Co. was on the Tryon St. side of the structure.

In January 1922 the Southern Radio Corporation established its headquarters on the 9th floor of the Independence Building (Realty Building). Founded in 1920 by Fred M. Laxton, this organization had created an amateur radio station, broadcasting under the call sign of DID. In April 1922 it received its commercial radio license and located its transmitter and studios on the 11th floor of the Independence Building (Realty Building). Now known as WBT, the radio station was the first to operate commercially in the Carolinas and among the earliest to attain that status in the United States. WBT continued to operate in the structure until 1926, when Mr. C. C. Coddington moved its facilities to 500 W. Trade St.

The most massive transformation of the Independence Building (Realty Building) occurred in 1927-28. The Independence Trust Co. occupied temporary headquarters in the building on W. Trade St. which the Merchants and Farmers National Bank had recently vacated. The construction contract was awarded to the James Baird Co. of New York City. The J. A. Jones Construction Co., which had occupied the Independence Building since 1909, moved its headquarters to the 4th floor of the Commercial Bank Building, never to return. Local tradition holds that Mr. Jones was irritated because his firm had not received the contract.

The architect for the renovation was William L. Stoddard, who had designed the Johnston Building on S. Tryon St. and the Hotel Charlotte on W. Trade St. Indeed, J. H. Little had served on the committee which had recommended Mr. Stoddard to the board of directors of the Citizens Hotel company, the agency which had superintended the latter project. In 1927 Mr. Little turned to H. L. Stoddard again, this time to design a major renovation of the Independence Building. Mr. Stoddard was recognized as one of the leading hotel architects in the United States, having designed such edifices as the O Henry Hotel in Greeensboro, N.C., the Sheraton Hotel in High Point, N.C., the Penn-Harris in Harrisburg, Va., the Tutwiler in Birmingham, Ala., the Winecoff and the Georgian Terrace in Atlanta, Ga. At the time of the awarding of the contract for the Independence Building, Mr. Stoddard had an office in Washington, D.C.

The refurbished Independence Building opened to the public on March 13, 1928. The first two floors of the structure had been altered substantially. The front entrance to the Independence Trust Co. had been moved from N. Tryon St. to W. Trade St. The mezzanine floor now overlooked the main banking lobby. The cages had been removed from the lobby and had been replaced by the English type of open front teller’s quarters.” The mezzanine ceiling was finished in gold and blue. “Its heavy irregularity,” commented The Charlotte Observer, “gives it a massive appearance.” The elevators were no longer in the center of the building but had been moved to the southwest corner of the edifice. The interior walls of the lobby were ” of stone from the George Washington quarry,” and the floors were of imported Italian marble.” Italian marble was also used “on sections of the walls.” The Charlotte Observer went on to report that the “directors room” was located at the rear of the mezzanine floor and was “finished in imported walnut, with a portrait of the bank president, Julian Little, above a dignified fireplace.” Among the more intriguing features of the refurbished Independence Trust Co. was “a clock in the sidewalk on the Trade street aide near the door.”

The Charlotte Observer reported that “more then 5,000 people attended the formal opening” of the Independence Trust Co. on March 13, 1928. The local newspaper provided the following description of these festivities.

 

From 5 o’clock in the afternoon until 9 o’clock last night the lobby was filled with a steady stream of visitors. Officials of the bank shook hands with thousands of persons. Counters, desks and the mezzanine floor were decorated with flowers, and the band played throughout the evening.

 

The Charlotte News commented that “numerous bankers from across the Carolinas” had come to Charlotte “as guests of the Independence Trust Company to inspect the bank’s magnificent new quarters.” It is reasonable to assume that these visitors were particularly interested in the new vault in the basement. “The vault,” stated The Charlotte Observer, “is equipped with a delicately sound-tuned burglar alarm system which a demonstrator caused to ring merely by clapping his hands in the interior.” In another section of the basement was “a small vault for night deposits,” in which customers could place money by means of “a chute outside the building.” The basement also contained a “safety deposit box vault” and “private booths” in which customers could examine the contents of their safety deposit boxes. A locker room and showers were also in the basement.

Two floors had been added at the top of the Independence Building, and the heavy cornice had been removed. Access to the upper floors was provided by three new elevators. The Charlotte Observer reported that they would “stop automatically at whatever floor the occupants of the car desire.” “They are set for certain floors,” the newspaper stated, “when the persons enter them and announce their destination.”

Mr. Julian H. Little must have been a happy man in 1928. For over twenty years he had been among the leaders of the banking establishment of this community. Any doubts which he might have had about his reputation would have been removed by an editorial which appeared in The Charlotte News on March 14, 1928.

 

The development of the Independence Trust Company has, under his leadership, . . . been constant, steady and organically sound. It has come to be regarded as one of the solidest banking institutions in the South because not only of the personal popularity of those in its command, but because they are known here and yonder to be executives of exceptional judgment, caution, conservatism, along with a zeal for service to their customers and the public.

 

Unfortunately, the Independence Trust Co. was not able to live up to its billing. It failed to open following the bank holiday which President Roosevelt declared in March 1933. Attempts were made to merge with other financial institutions, including the Farmers and Merchants National Bank of Charlotte. Other local banks, led by the American Trust Co., persuaded Federal authorities to disallow any such merger on the grounds that the Charlotte market could not support another bank. This decision forced the Independence Trust Co. into bankruptcy.

The Independence Building continued to function as an office facility until April 1976, when the last of the tenants departed from the upper floors. Four tenants remain on the first floor of the structure. The major components of the banking lobby and the mezzanine have been sacrificed to the needs of the various commercial enterprises that have occupied the ground floor. The uppermost floors of the structure were radically altered by an architectural firm (Odell & Associates) which occupied that space in recent years. At present, the future of the Independence Building itself is very much in doubt.

7. A brief architectural description of the property: This report contains an architectural description prepared by Ruth Little-Stokes, formerly of the Division of Archives and History.

 

8. Documentation of why and in what ways the property meets the criteria set forth in N.C.G.S. 160A-399.4:

a. Historical and cultural significance: The property known as the Independence Building (Realty Building) is historically and culturally significant for several reasons. First, it possesses architectural importance as the first steel-frame high rise building erected in North Carolina. Indeed, the development of the skyscraper remains the single most important contribution that architects of the United States have made to the building arts. Second, it was designed by Frank P. Milburn, an architect who enjoyed a national reputation and who has been featured in The North Carolina Historical Review. Third, William L. Stoddard, another architect of national standing, prepared the design of the refurbishment which was carried out in 1927-28. Fourth, the Independence Building (Realty Building) was the first skyscraper erected by the J. A. Jones Construction Company. Fifth, the structure has been associated with the careers of many of Charlotte’s most prominent citizens of this century, men such as D. A. Tompkins, J. H. Little, J. A. Jones and W. H. Belk. Sixth, the building housed the initial studios of Radio Station WBT, the first commercial broadcasting facility in the two Carolinas and among the earliest in the nation. Worth noting in this regard is the fact that social historians consider the development of commercial radio to be one of the most important developments of the twentieth century.

b. Suitability for preservation restoration: The exterior of the structure retains its essential appearance as of 1928, except for the Trade and Tryon St. facades of the first floor. Moreover, several of the office floors have retained their essential integrity. It is reasonable to assume that additional research would provide the information necessary to restore the structure to its appearance as of 1928. However, the restoration of the interior of the edifice should not be a primary objective.

c. Cost of acquisition, restoration, maintenance or repair: At present the Commission has no intention of purchasing this property. It assumes that all costs associated with renovating and maintaining the structure will be paid by the owner or subsequent owner of the property.

d. Educational value: The property has educational value because of its historic and cultural significance.

e. Possibilities for adaptive or alternative use of the property: This property is highly suited for a variety of adaptive uses.

f. Appraised value: The current tax appraised value of the structure itself is $241,610. The current tax appraised value of the .145 acres of land is $316,800. The most recent annual tax bill on the structure and land was $9,381.29. The Commission is aware that designation would allow the owner to apply annually for an automatic deferral of 50% of the rate upon which the Ad Valorem taxes are calculated.

g. The administrative and financial responsibility of any person or organization willing to underwrite all or a portion of such costs: As stated earlier, at present the Commission has no intention of purchasing the fee simple or any lesser included interest in this property. Furthermore, the Commission assumes that all costs associated with the structure will be met by whatever party now owns or will own the property.

9. Documentation of why in what ways the property meets the criteria established for listing in the National Register of Historic Places: The Commission believes that the property known as the Independence Building does meet the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places. Basic to the Commissionís position is its understanding of the purpose of the National Register. Established in 1966, the National Register represents the decision of the Federal Government to expand its listing of historic properties to include properties of local, regional, and State significance. The Commission believes that the Independence Building (Realty Building) is of local, regional, and state historic significance and therefore meets the criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.

10. Documentation of why and in what ways the property is of historic importance to Charlotte and/or Mecklenburg County: The Independence Building (Realty Building) is historically important to Charlotte and Mecklenburg County because it was the first steel-frame high rise building erected in Charlotte and in North Carolina, because it was designed by two architects of regional significance (Frank P. Milburn and William L. Stoddard), because it was the first skyscraper erected by the J. A. Jones Construction Company, because it has been associated with the careers of many of Charlotte’s most prominent citizens of this century, and because it housed the initial studios of Radio Station WBT.

---

Bibliography

An Inventory of Buildings In Mecklenburg County And Charlotte For the Historic Properties Commission.

Charlotte City Directory (1912, p.583, p.587); (1913, p.240, p.606); (1914, p.288); (1915, p.279); (1918, p.l80, p.324); (1920, p.l88, p.34); (1922, p.598, p.897);(1923-24, p.744); (1925, p.l323); (1926, p.l080); (1927, p.473, p.677).

The Charlotte Evening Chronicle(May,18,1908,p.5);(May 3,1912,p.9).

The Charlotte News (February 28, 1927, p. 3.) (March 13. 1928, p.l7); (March 14, 1928, p. 6-A).

 

The Charlotte Observer (July 27, 1905, p. 5); (September 3, 1905, p. 5); September 24, 1905, p. 4.);(November 28, 1906, p. 4.); December 2, 1906, p. 6); (January 7, 1907, p. 7); April 24, 1907, p. 7); (April 24, 1907), p. 7); (May 28, 1907, p. 9); (January 4, 1908, p. 5); (January 5, 1908, p. 5); January 7, 1908, p. 6); (January 8, 1908, p. 5); (January 11, 1908, p. 6); (January 13, 1908, p. 5); (January 14, 1908, p. 7); (January 15, 1908, p. 4); (January 17, 1908, p. 5); (January 21, 1908, p. 5); (January 29, 1908, pp. 5,6); (January 30, 1908, p.5); (February 3, 1908, pp. 4,5);(February 4, 1908, pp. 5,8); (February 10, 1908, p. 5); (February 12, 1908, p. 6); (February 13, 1908, p. 5); (February 15, 1908, p. 7); (February 17, 1908, p. 5); (February 24, 1908, p. 5); (March 3, 1908, p. 5); (March 23, 1908, p. 5); (April 3, 1908, p. 6);(April 4, 1908, p. 4); (April 6, 1908, p. 5); (April 7, 1908, p. 7); (April 11, 1908, p. 5); (April 17, 1908, p. 7); (April 20, 1908, p. 5); April 24, 1908, p. 5); (April 25, 1908, p. 5); (May 5, 1908, p. 5); (May 6, 1908, p. 5); (May 12, 1908, p. 5); (May 18, 1908, p. 1); (May 22, 1908, p. 4); (May 25, 1908, p. 5); (May 28, 1908, p. 5); (May 31, 1908, p. 5); (June 8, 1908, p. 6); (June 11, 1908, p. 9); June 14, 1908, p. 6); June 20, 1908, pp. 5,6); (June 22, 1908, p. 7); (June 24, 1908, p. 10); (June 27, 1908, pp. 5,6); (June 29, 1908, p. 5); (June 30, 1908, p. 5); (July 1, 1908, p. 5); (July 2, 1908, p. 5); (July 3, 1908, pp. 4,5); (July 5, 1908, p. 5); (July 12, 1908, pp. 4,6); July 13, 1908, p. 5); (July 20, 1908, p. 5); (July 21, 1908, p. 4); (August 3, 1908, p. 5); (August 24, 1908, p. 5); (August 25, 1908, p. 6); (August 29, 1908, p. 4); (September 3, 1908, p. 7); ( September 11, 1908, p. 6); (September 14, 1908, p. 5); (September 28, 1908, p. 5); (October 8, 1908, p. 7); (November 13, 1908, p. 5); (November 25, 1908, p. 6); (November 26, 1908, p. 5); (December 2, 1908, p. 6); (December 18, 1908, p. 7); (December 27, 1908, pp. 5,6); (January 10, 1909, p. 5); (April 2, 1909, p. 5); (April 11, 1909, p. 4); (May 2, 1909, p. 6); (May 6, 1909, p. 7); (May 8, 1909, p. 5); (May 9, 1909, p. 5); ((May 14, 1909, p. 5); (May 16, 1909, pp. 6,11); (May 18, 1909, p. 6); (October 19, 1909, p. 10); (January 8, 1912, p. 6); (January 9, 1912, p. 4); (January 10, 1912, p. 11); (January 11, 1912, p. 5); (May 2, 1912, p. 12); (May 3, 1912, pp. 6,9); (May 4, 1912, p. 6); (February 1, 1922, p. 4); (March 5, 1922, p. 1); (April 27, 1922, p. 4); March 6, 1927, Sec. 2, p. 9); (March 14, 1928), Sec. 2, p. 1); (September 13, 1955, pp. 1B, 14B).

Lawrence Wodehouse, “Frank Pierce Milburn (1868-1926), A Major Southern Architect,” The North Carolina Historical Review(Summer 1973), pp., 289-303.

Legette Blythe and Charles R. Brockman, Hornets’ Nest. The Story of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County (McNally of Charlotte, 1961), p. 386.

Manuscript Folders in the Carolina Room of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Library

The News and Observer (Raleigh, N.C.), (June 21, 1908, pp. 1,8); (June 28, 1908, p. 1).

Records of the Building Inspection Department of Mecklenburg County. See Building Permit #7498, issued on February 28, 1927.

Records of the Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds Office. See Deed Book 232, pp. 325,326; Deed Book 870, p. 309; Deed Book 3386, p. 449; Deed Book 3468, p. 445; Deed Book 3684, pp. 384, 386.

Records of the Mecklenburg County Tax Office. The Tax Parcel Number of the property is 078-014-07.

1911 Sanborn Insurance Map of Charlotte, p. 4.

Vital Statistics of Mecklenburg County.

“WBT Official Radiologue,” Vol. 1, No. 1, 1928, p. 2.

Date of Preparation of this Report: December 7, 1977

Prepared by:Dr. Dan L. Morrill, Director
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Historic Properties Commission
139 Middleton Dr.
Charlotte, N.C. 28207
Telephone 332-2726
 

 

Architectural Description

 

Ruth Little-Stokes
December 5, 1977

 

The Independence Building, a fourteen-story office building of the Renaissance style in the Beaux-Arts tradition, stands on the northwest corner of “The Square,” the intersection of Trade and Tryon streets in Charlotte. The ornate 1908-09 building, now dwarfed by the towering steel and glass skyscrapers of Charlotte’s present skyline, is a distinguished monument to the city’s commercial dominance in the state throughout the twentieth century. The chief features of the design: the articulation of the rectangular block into divisions of base, composed of the lower portion, the shaft, the center eight stories, and the capital, the original top story; and the dramatic treatment of each bay of the shaft as a single soaring arch, are both derived from the seminal skyscraper designs of Richardson, Adler & Sullivan, and other architects in late nineteenth century Chicago. The monumentality of the design is somewhat weakened by the replacement of portions of the base with mid-twentieth century storefronts, and by the addition of two stories above the original twelfth story. Yet the quality of the rich detailing compensates for these later changes to the original design.

 

The base of the skyscraper, five by seven bays in width, consists of the heavily quoined first story and mezzanine (second story) and the corresponding rusticated third story. The base was remodeled in 1927-28 when the two top floors were added, and its classical design harmonizes with the original exterior treatment of the shaft. The only portion of the base where the 1928 treatment is fully visible is the west corner of the Trade Street elevation; the remaining bays were remodeled in the mid-twentieth century. This unaltered section contains a high granite foundation, wide quoined piers surfaced with finely striated limestone, Doric capitals, a wide frieze, and molded cornice. The original upper treatment continues across the entire Trade Street elevation and halfway the length of the Tryon Street elevation, above the present storefronts. On the Trade Street frieze are applied letters forming “Independence Trust Company,” while the Tryon Street frieze bears the letters “Independence Building.” Each bay contains metal casement windows, with a flat-paneled spandrel above the first story casement and a lintel with applied circular ornament above the mezzanine casement. In the center bay of the Tryon St. elevation and one bay westward from the center of the Trade St. elevation were identical main entrances. The Tryon St. entrance is gone, but the Trade St. entrance is unaltered except for the replacement of the original revolving door with a double plate glass door. The entrance surround consists of flanking brass Corinthian pilasters with side and transom panels. A heavy cast-iron canopy, supported by curvilinear iron brackets and iron chains attached to the flanking piers with iron cartouches, shelters the entrance. The canopy is a metal framework infilled with reinforced mesh glass and ornamental dental and cartouched moldings and a scalloped drip course. The third story is surfaced with yellow brick veneer, recessed every four courses to simulate rustication, and capped with a molded limestone frieze and cornice. The corner bays contain wooden over-over-one sash windows; the inside bays, identical sash in pairs.

 

The shaft, the dominant division of the design, is articulated by brick pilasters which soar from the forth to the eleventh story, terminating in round arches. These beveled brick pilasters divide the interior bays and terminate in plaster Corinthian capitals and beveled round arches with corbeled surrounds. The corner bays are emphasized by rusticated brick pilasters which terminate in keystoned windows. A molded cornice caps the eleventh story. The veneer and sash treatment of the shaft are identical to that of the third story. Between each story of the center bays are flat-paneled spandrels with alternating applied circular and diamond-shaped ornament.

 

The original “capital,” the twelfth and stop story, is recessed behind the cornice of the shaft. It has identical sash and similar decorative treatment, with brick panels between bays. The frieze is decorated with applied ornament consisting of diamond motifs at the corners and circular motifs elsewhere. The original heavy dental cornice was removed when the thirteenth and fourteenth stories were added in 1927-28. These stories correspond closely in design to the twelfth story, with matching brick veneer and sash, spandrels which repeat those of the shaft, a frieze accented with applied cartouche and shield motifs, and a molded cornice. The southwest corner of the flat roof has a narrow two-story penthouse which houses mechanical equipment.

 

The north and west elevations of the building are treated very plainly, for the architect probably anticipated that adjacent buildings would conceal them. Each is covered with yellow brick veneer, with a segmental-arched window with a brick flat arch and a two-over-two wooden sash in each bay. A double brick string course marks the original eleventh story cornice level. The center bay of the west elevation is an open well, allowing light and ventilation to the inner offices. The original fire escapes were beneath the windows of the west elevation but were replaced by the present fire escape in the light well, with access doors replacing windows on each story. The north elevation has a brick smokestack at the northwest corner, and the three west bays are set back slightly behind the wall level of the east bays. The added stories differ only in that the sash are not arched.

 

The original interior treatment of the third through twelfth floors is well-preserved, but the first floor and mezzanine have undergone two major renovations, and only remnants of the sumptuous decorative treatment of the public areas of these two levels remain. The first and second floors originally housed a bank in the south half and drug store in the north half. In 1927-28 this area was converted to a single bank lobby with a mezzanine, and all trace of the original finish was evidently obliterated. The second renovation occurred ca. 1950 when the lobby was partitioned into four retail stores. The elevator lobby, entered through the Trade Street entrance, retains most of its original finish, with terazzo floors, black marble baseboards, walls sheathed in darkly veined marble arranged in geometric panels reminiscent of the Florentine Renaissance style, and a plaster coffered ceiling with egg and dart moldings. The suspended metal light fixture of classical design is perhaps original. In the west wall are three elevators, each with paneled, richly ornamented brass doors. Above each is a marble dial indicating floor level. In the northwest corner of the lobby is a small door leading to one of the two stairs in the building. The stair has while marble treads, a marble dado, and a delicate cast-iron railing. Beside the lobby door is a large brass mailbox of classical design, connected by chutes to the upper floors.

 

The 1928 mezzanine was apparently an enclosed balcony extending around four sides of the banking room. This level is now a completely separate floor, and traces of the ceiling treatment of the two-story banking room survive in the central area. The interior supporting plastered posts of the bank room Corinthian capitals. The lobby ceiling consists of boldly painted red and gold square and polygonal plaster coffers, with egg and dart and medallion ornament.

 

The upper floors, each identical in floor plan, have a stair in the center of the Tryon Street side and corridors extending north and south of the stair, with flanking offices. Except for a few lower level floors, the stair retains its original marble and iron finish, similar to the rear stair. Each of the original floors is finished with white marble floors and dados, black marble baseboards, and golden oak woodwork. Most of the original office entrances, consisting of oak doors with frosted glass panels, transoms and sidelights, remain intact. The interior finish of the offices is very simple, and may of the interior partition walls have been rearranged.

---

Special Note. This report was prepared in December 1977, when the Historic Landmarks Commission, then Historic Properties Commission, was making a major effort to save the Independence Building. At that time the Commission could only delay demolition for up to 180 days. Leroy Rushing, the owner of the Independence Building, sold it to Charlotte developer Henry Faison. Faison was determined to demolish the Independence Building to make way for the office building which still stands on the site today. Even though the Independence Building was listed in the National Register of Historic Places, even though it was a locally designated historic landmark, even though noted urban designers, such as Kevin Lynch of Boston, urged the community to rally behind the preservation of the first steel-frame skyscraper in the two Carolinas, Mr. Faison moved resolutely ahead. The building was imploded in September 1981.